This CD5L Biologics Sequence Review Report was produced with PatSnap Biology Modality MCP workflows. It turns patent-scale sequence search, sequence retrieval, pairwise alignment and target evidence into a reproducible diligence narrative. Explore the PatSnap MCP servers used in this report.
Review date: 5 August 2026. This report supports R&D, competitive-intelligence and IP triage. It is not a legal opinion, freedom-to-operate conclusion or validity analysis. A sequence hit does not establish infringement, and a no-hit or low-hit result does not establish clearance.
CD5L is a reviewed human protein asset represented by UniProt entry O43866. The reference sequence contains 347 amino acids and is annotated as CD5 antigen-like. PatSnap’s patent-scale screen returned 24 matching records in the configured result universe. The leading reviewed hit showed 100.00% query identity across 347/347, with the database claim annotation recorded as No.
The resulting screen is classified as moderate-to-elevated diligence priority. That label prioritizes diligence; it does not classify the asset as blocked, available or unique. Whole-protein identity can be driven by conserved domains, common signal peptides, transmembrane regions or endogenous human sequence. Patent relevance depends on whether live claims cover the complete sequence, a fragment, an engineered variant, an antibody recognizing the target, a use, or a functional genus.
CD5 antigen-like is a traceable human protein sequence suitable for systematic similarity screening. For biologics teams, the sequence can matter in several distinct ways: it may be the administered protein, an extracellular target, an antigen used to raise antibodies, a receptor domain incorporated into a fusion, or a reference against which engineered variants are defined. Those possibilities produce different patent questions even when they share the same gene symbol.
This report therefore separates sequence proximity from legal scope. A close patent-sequence match can identify families worth reading, yet naturally occurring human protein sequence is not itself a conclusion about enforceable rights. Conversely, engineered substitutions, truncations, Fc fusions, linkers, glycosylation-site changes or epitope-defined claims may be commercially important even when the full-length reference is not reproduced verbatim.
The workflow began with ls_sequence_search_submit against ALLPATENT protein records and used ls_sequence_search_get_results to retrieve the leading evidence. ls_sequence_fetch resolved the selected patent-sequence record, and ls_sequence_alignment performed a PSA comparison to the reviewed UniProt query. Finally, ls_antibody_antigen_search tested target-linked antibody evidence and ls_patent_sequence_fetch retrieved sequences from a resolved patent record where available.
| Evidence step | CD5L result | Interpretive limit |
|---|---|---|
| Reference query | 347 aa; reviewed human UniProt O43866 | Reference protein may differ from a therapeutic construct or isoform. |
| Patent similarity | 24 records; leading identity 100.00%; coverage 347/347 | Records are not deduplicated patent families or live claims. |
| Sequence detail | Sequence 15420351, 369 aa | Sequence annotations require specification-level confirmation. |
| PSA | 1 alignment block(s) | Coordinates do not identify claim scope or biological function. |
| Target evidence | 55 antibody–antigen records | Aliases and research antibodies can affect counts. |
| Patent sequences | 361 associated sequences | Listings can contain controls, fragments and unrelated examples. |
The leading result was evaluated under the primary screen using 70–100% identity and 80–100% query coverage. It reported 347/347 identical positions, query coverage 347/347, subject coverage 347/369, E-value 0 and 0/347 gaps. The database marked the record as No for the claim annotation field.
The primary result was obtained inside the predefined strict screening window. That improves reproducibility, but the window still excludes lower-identity functional analogues, short motifs and nucleotide-level variants.
The raw count of 24 records should not be read as the number of independent inventions. One sequence can appear in applications, grants, continuations, divisionals and multiple jurisdictions. It can also recur as a reference, antigen, control or prior-art comparator. Family consolidation by earliest priority, applicant, simple family and legal status is therefore essential before ranking competitive risk.
ls_sequence_fetch resolved sequence number 15420351 with a length of 369 aa, annotated “Disease-associated protein (human clone US06812339-SEQID-10311)”. The fetched record was then supplied to ls_sequence_alignment for pairwise comparison with the reviewed CD5L sequence.
The PSA returned 1 alignment block(s). Reviewers should map mismatches to functional domains, extracellular segments, transmembrane regions, cleavage sites and engineered junctions. A concentrated change at a binding interface can matter more than a similar number of substitutions distributed across a nonfunctional region.
The target-name query returned 55 antibody–antigen records. The leading record was US20240383999A1, “CD5l-binding antibodies and uses for the same”. These records support target-context review, but they can describe research antibodies, comparators, parental molecules or constructs that do not correspond to the reviewed therapeutic asset.
Using the patent identifier resolved from the leading target record, ls_patent_sequence_fetch returned 361 associated patent sequences. The listing may include antigens, antibodies, fragments, controls, primers and manufacturing elements; each sequence number must be interpreted against the specification and claims.
Target-level evidence complements sequence similarity because biologics patents often define inventions through binding, epitope, function, disease use or combinations rather than an exact full-length target sequence. The strongest review links the returned sequence to a patent family, verifies the role of the sequence in the specification, and then reads live claims in the jurisdictions relevant to development or commercialization.
| Dimension | Screening signal | Required next check |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence proximity | 100.00% leading query identity | Map differences by domain, isoform and engineered construct. |
| Coverage | 347/347 | Determine whether the match is full-length, fragmentary or domain-specific. |
| Claim annotation | No | Verify the sequence number against live independent and dependent claims. |
| Target evidence | 55 records | Search gene, protein-name, alias and pathway terminology. |
| Legal conclusion | Not determined | Review priority, ownership, licensing, prosecution, validity and territory. |
CD5L produced a traceable sequence-search result with 100.00% leading identity, 347/347 query coverage, 1 PSA block(s), 55 target-linked antibody records and 361 directly fetched patent sequences. Together, these signals support moderate-to-elevated diligence priority and a prioritized family-and-claim review. They do not support a binary clearance or infringement statement.
Reference sequence metadata: reviewed human UniProt entry O43866. Patent-scale similarity, sequence detail, PSA, patent-sequence and antibody–antigen evidence was retrieved through PatSnap Biology Modality MCP on 5 August 2026. Results are bounded by the configured query, thresholds, aliases, task limits and database coverage; rerun at the decision date.