This LILRA3 Biologics Sequence Review Report was produced with PatSnap Biology Modality MCP workflows. It turns patent-scale sequence search, sequence retrieval, pairwise alignment and target evidence into a reproducible diligence narrative. Explore the PatSnap MCP servers used in this report.
Review date: 5 August 2026. This report supports R&D, competitive-intelligence and IP triage. It is not a legal opinion, freedom-to-operate conclusion or validity analysis. A sequence hit does not establish infringement, and a no-hit or low-hit result does not establish clearance.
LILRA3 is a reviewed human protein asset represented by UniProt entry Q8N6C8. The reference sequence contains 439 amino acids and is annotated as Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily A member 3. PatSnap’s patent-scale screen returned 200 matching records in the configured result universe. The leading reviewed hit showed 100.00% query identity across 439/439, with the database claim annotation recorded as Yes.
The resulting screen is classified as elevated diligence priority. That label prioritizes diligence; it does not classify the asset as blocked, available or unique. Whole-protein identity can be driven by conserved domains, common signal peptides, transmembrane regions or endogenous human sequence. Patent relevance depends on whether live claims cover the complete sequence, a fragment, an engineered variant, an antibody recognizing the target, a use, or a functional genus.
Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily A member 3 is a traceable human protein sequence suitable for systematic similarity screening. For biologics teams, the sequence can matter in several distinct ways: it may be the administered protein, an extracellular target, an antigen used to raise antibodies, a receptor domain incorporated into a fusion, or a reference against which engineered variants are defined. Those possibilities produce different patent questions even when they share the same gene symbol.
This report therefore separates sequence proximity from legal scope. A close patent-sequence match can identify families worth reading, yet naturally occurring human protein sequence is not itself a conclusion about enforceable rights. Conversely, engineered substitutions, truncations, Fc fusions, linkers, glycosylation-site changes or epitope-defined claims may be commercially important even when the full-length reference is not reproduced verbatim.
The workflow began with ls_sequence_search_submit against ALLPATENT protein records and used ls_sequence_search_get_results to retrieve the leading evidence. ls_sequence_fetch resolved the selected patent-sequence record, and ls_sequence_alignment performed a PSA comparison to the reviewed UniProt query. Finally, ls_antibody_antigen_search tested target-linked antibody evidence and ls_patent_sequence_fetch retrieved sequences from a resolved patent record where available.
| Evidence step | LILRA3 result | Interpretive limit |
|---|---|---|
| Reference query | 439 aa; reviewed human UniProt Q8N6C8 | Reference protein may differ from a therapeutic construct or isoform. |
| Patent similarity | 200 records; leading identity 100.00%; coverage 439/439 | Records are not deduplicated patent families or live claims. |
| Sequence detail | Sequence 9401156, 439 aa | Sequence annotations require specification-level confirmation. |
| PSA | 1 alignment block(s) | Coordinates do not identify claim scope or biological function. |
| Target evidence | 10 antibody–antigen records | Aliases and research antibodies can affect counts. |
| Patent sequences | 97 associated sequences | Listings can contain controls, fragments and unrelated examples. |
The leading result was evaluated under a supplementary sensitivity search using 50–100% identity and 50–100% query coverage. It reported 439/439 identical positions, query coverage 439/439, subject coverage 439/439, E-value 0 and 0/439 gaps. The database marked the record as Yes for the claim annotation field.
The strict primary window did not yield a usable alignment within the initial service run, so this report also records a broader sensitivity screen. The broader result is explicitly secondary evidence and should not be compared directly with a strict-window hit without noting the threshold change.
The raw count of 200 records should not be read as the number of independent inventions. One sequence can appear in applications, grants, continuations, divisionals and multiple jurisdictions. It can also recur as a reference, antigen, control or prior-art comparator. Family consolidation by earliest priority, applicant, simple family and legal status is therefore essential before ranking competitive risk.
ls_sequence_fetch resolved sequence number 9401156 with a length of 439 aa, annotated “Leukocyte Ig-like receptor A3 (human gene LILRA3 isoform 1 precursor)”. The fetched record was then supplied to ls_sequence_alignment for pairwise comparison with the reviewed LILRA3 sequence.
The PSA returned 1 alignment block(s). Reviewers should map mismatches to functional domains, extracellular segments, transmembrane regions, cleavage sites and engineered junctions. A concentrated change at a binding interface can matter more than a similar number of substitutions distributed across a nonfunctional region.
The target-name query returned 10 antibody–antigen records. The leading record was CN120435496A, “调节巨噬细胞活性的组合物和方法”. These records support target-context review, but they can describe research antibodies, comparators, parental molecules or constructs that do not correspond to the reviewed therapeutic asset.
Using the patent identifier resolved from the leading target record, ls_patent_sequence_fetch returned 97 associated patent sequences. The listing may include antigens, antibodies, fragments, controls, primers and manufacturing elements; each sequence number must be interpreted against the specification and claims.
Target-level evidence complements sequence similarity because biologics patents often define inventions through binding, epitope, function, disease use or combinations rather than an exact full-length target sequence. The strongest review links the returned sequence to a patent family, verifies the role of the sequence in the specification, and then reads live claims in the jurisdictions relevant to development or commercialization.
| Dimension | Screening signal | Required next check |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence proximity | 100.00% leading query identity | Map differences by domain, isoform and engineered construct. |
| Coverage | 439/439 | Determine whether the match is full-length, fragmentary or domain-specific. |
| Claim annotation | Yes | Verify the sequence number against live independent and dependent claims. |
| Target evidence | 10 records | Search gene, protein-name, alias and pathway terminology. |
| Legal conclusion | Not determined | Review priority, ownership, licensing, prosecution, validity and territory. |
LILRA3 produced a traceable sequence-search result with 100.00% leading identity, 439/439 query coverage, 1 PSA block(s), 10 target-linked antibody records and 97 directly fetched patent sequences. Together, these signals support elevated diligence priority and a prioritized family-and-claim review. They do not support a binary clearance or infringement statement.
Reference sequence metadata: reviewed human UniProt entry Q8N6C8. Patent-scale similarity, sequence detail, PSA, patent-sequence and antibody–antigen evidence was retrieved through PatSnap Biology Modality MCP on 5 August 2026. Results are bounded by the configured query, thresholds, aliases, task limits and database coverage; rerun at the decision date.