DCY636 NCT07604324 Clinical Landscape 2026

Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace

This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.

Data snapshot: 16 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.

Phase 1

Clinical phase

Recruiting

Recruitment status

63

Planned enrollment

2028-01-27

Primary-completion proxy

Executive view

NCT07604324 evaluates DCY636 in Dermatitis, Atopic. The disclosed sponsor is Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc., the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is Japan. The first listed primary endpoint is Part 1-Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), assessed over Up to approximately 202 days.

The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.

PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.

How the MCP evidence stack was assembled

Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT07604324 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Dermatitis, Atopic landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for DCY636, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc..

This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.

Trial landscape table

Trial	Asset / intervention	Phase / status	Sponsor	Geography	Primary endpoint	Readout proxy
NCT07604324	DCY636	Phase 1 / Recruiting	Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc.	Japan	Part 1-Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) Up to approximately 202 days	2028-01-27
NCT07752784	[18F]Florzolotau	Phase 3 / Recruiting	JYAMS PET Research & Development Ltd.	China	Evaluate the consistency between the visual interpretation results of [18F]-APN-1607 injection PET imaging and the auth… 8 months	2027-04-30
NCT07746817	NBL-023	Phase 1 / Not yet recruiting	Bionyra Pharma SAS	Geography not reported	Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) From first dose through end of study (up to Week 48 for BYN-001 recip…	2028-06-01
NCT07713186	Betamethasone	Phase 4 / Not yet recruiting	Cairo University	Egypt	Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 3 months	2027-01-01
CTRI/2026/07/114147	Ruxolitinib Phosphate	Phase 3 / Not Yet Recruiting	Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.	India		Timing not reported

The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.

Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP

Protocol design and endpoint interpretation

NCT07604324 is a Phase 1, recruiting study with 63 planned participants. Allocation is Randomized, masking is Double, and the intervention model is Parallel Assignment.

The primary endpoint is “Part 1-Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)” over “Up to approximately 202 days.” The retrieved endpoint description is: Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and laboratory values qualifying and reported as AEs..

Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 63 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.

No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.

Indexed readouts in the surrounding landscape

5 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Dermatitis, Atopic. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT07604324 unless the registration number matches.

Sustained on/off-treatment disease control with abrocitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

Phase 3; n=not reported; DLQI = 3.5 Point Source: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/42165315/

Benefit–risk profile comparison between dupilumab and upadacitinib: a structured benefit–risk assessment of the Heads Up trial

Phase 3; n=385; Benefit-risk score = 61.0 point ; Benefit-risk score = 66.0 point Source: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/42223292/

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Derma…

Phase 2; n=50; Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16(Least Squares Mean): Least Square (LS) Mean Difference = -20.484(90% CI, -40.6573 to -0.3103), P-Value = 0.095; Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16(Least Squares Mean): Least Square (LS) Mean Difference = -20.484(90% CI, -40.6573 to -0.3103), P-Value = 0.095 Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT06101823

Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.

Asset and sponsor context

No exact Drug & Asset MCP profile was returned for the protocol wording “DCY636.” The report therefore avoids inferring modality, target or global development stage from the name alone.

No exact Company & Deal Intelligence profile was returned for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc.. Sponsor identity is retained from the trial protocol without adding unsupported corporate claims.

For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.

Development white space

Endpoint white space. Determine whether a more patient-relevant outcome, longer durability window or blinded central assessment would resolve uncertainty left by the current endpoint.
Population white space. Test biomarker-defined, treatment-line or risk-stratified subgroups where effect size and unmet need could be clearer.
Comparator white space. Identify whether the study can support differentiation against the current standard of care rather than only activity against baseline or placebo.
Geographic white space. Assess whether the disclosed footprint supports recruitment, regulatory transferability and commercial generalizability.
Sequencing white space. Clarify whether DCY636 is intended for monotherapy, combination, maintenance, rescue or an earlier treatment line.

White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.

Strategic implications and next readouts

For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.

For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.

Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.

Source trail and bottom line

Anchor trial: NCT07604324
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07604324
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 16 September 2026.

DCY636 in Dermatitis, Atopic is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes Part 1-Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and 2028-01-27 the leading decision points.

Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP