
Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace
This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.
Data snapshot: 18 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.
Clinical phase
Recruitment status
Planned enrollment
Primary-completion proxy
NCT06688435 evaluates SYS-6020 in Myasthenia Gravis. The disclosed sponsor is CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is China. The first listed primary endpoint is The frequency and the grade of DLT and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. (For the dose-escalation phase), assessed over 12 months.
The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.
PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.
Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT06688435 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Myasthenia Gravis landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for SYS-6020, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd..
This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.
| Trial | Asset / intervention | Phase / status | Sponsor | Geography | Primary endpoint | Readout proxy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT06688435 | SYS-6020 | Phase 1 / Recruiting | CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. | China | The frequency and the grade of DLT and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. (For the dose-escala… 12 months | 2028-12-01 |
| NCT07058298 | GC-012F | Early Phase 1 / Recruiting | Sponsor not reported | China | The frequency and severity of adverse events. Since signing the ICF until 24-week post-infusion or withdrawal from… | 2027-02-13 |
| NCT07039916 | Imeroprubart | Phase 3 / Recruiting | Immunovant Sciences Ltd. | Argentina, Romania, Hungary, Czechia, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Greece, Poland, Denmark, Mexico, Italy, Serbia, Germany | Change from Baseline in MG-ADL Score for Antibody-positive Participants Baseline to Week 12 | 2027-12-01 |
| NCT07022197 | Anti-BAFFR CART(Tianjin Medical University General Hospital) | Phase 1/2 / Recruiting | Tianjin Medical University General Hospital | China | Types and incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) after BAFF-R CART cells infusion Up to 3 months post BAFF-R CART cells infusion | 2027-12-30 |
| NCT06987539 | Inebilizumab-cdon | Phase 2 / Recruiting | Amgen, Inc. | Argentina, United States, Poland, Brazil, France, Spain | Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Inebilizumab Up to Week 52 | 2030-03-13 |
The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.

Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP
NCT06688435 is a Phase 1, recruiting study with 60 planned participants. Allocation is Non-Randomized, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Sequential Assignment.
The primary endpoint is “The frequency and the grade of DLT and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. (For the dose-escalation phase)” over “12 months.” The retrieved endpoint description is: For the dose-escalation phase, the primary objective is to evaluate the safety of SYS6020, as measured by the frequency and nature of Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the incidence of all adverse events and serious adverse events. DLT is defined as any adverse event related to SYS6020 that occurs within 28 days after the infusion of SYS6020 and that meets certain criteria..
Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 60 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.
No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.
5 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Myasthenia Gravis. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT06688435 unless the registration number matches.
Phase 3; n=119; MG-ADL Total Score Change From Baseline(Least Squares Mean) = -1.90 points on a scale (90% Confidence Interval, -2.51 to -1.28); MG-ADL Total Score Change From Baseline(Least Squares Mean) = -3.35 points on a scale (90% Confidence Interval, -3.98 to -2.72) Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT06298552
Phase 3; n=238; exacerbation(26-week): HR = 0.41(95.0% CI, 0.24 - 0.7); exacerbation(26-week): HR = 0.41(95.0% CI, 0.24 - 0.7) Source: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/42573995/
Phase 3; n=129; EQ-5D-VAS(24-week) = 37.1 % ; EQ-5D-VAS(24-week) = 55.2 % Source: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/journal/14681331
Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.
SYS-6020 is indexed as in vivo CAR-T therapy with BCMA biology and a global stage of Phase 1. The asset profile lists CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology Shijiazhuang Co., Ltd. as an originator or developer.
CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. is indexed in China. The organization record is used to resolve sponsor identity. The record lists an unreported number of development-stage drug assets.
For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.
White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.
For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.
For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.
Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.
Anchor trial: NCT06688435
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06688435
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 18 September 2026.
SYS-6020 in Myasthenia Gravis is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes The frequency and the grade of DLT and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. (For the dose-escalation phase) and 2028-12-01 the leading decision points.

Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP