NCT07548385 Suzetrigine Pain, Postoperative Clinical Landscape Report 2026: Design, Endpoints, Sponsor and Readout Outlook
Turn a newly registered trial into a decision-ready clinical landscape. This report examines NCT07548385 using PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP for protocol design and endpoint evidence, with Drug & Asset MCP and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP used as the companion asset and sponsor enrichment workflow. Explore PatSnap MCP Servers to reproduce the research sequence inside an AI workflow.
MCP evidence snapshot: 23 July 2026. Trial records, recruitment status and projected dates can change after the snapshot and should be rechecked before operational decisions.
Why NCT07548385 is a hot trial to watch
Pain, Postoperative is being segmented by mechanism, treatment setting, geography and endpoint architecture. NCT07548385 is notable because it evaluates Suzetrigine in a Phase 3 design sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The main development question is whether the protocol can translate its rationale into a clinically interpretable and operationally credible readout.
Trial landscape snapshot
| Field | Indexed detail |
|---|---|
| Registration | NCT07548385 |
| Official title | Suzetrigine for Treatment and Reduction of Intense Discomfort After knEe Replacement PAIN (STRIDE-PAIN) |
| Phase / status | Phase 3 / Recruiting |
| Intervention | Suzetrigine |
| Sponsor | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai |
| Geography | United States |
| Enrollment | [object Object] |
| Primary endpoint | Opioid Consumption |
| Endpoint time frame | 5 days |
| Primary completion / readout proxy | [object Object] |
Protocol design and endpoint interpretation
This is a prospective, randomized study. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the addition of Suzetrigine, a new pain medication, to well established peri-operative pain regimen used for total knee replacement surgery will effect pain control. 1. Does Suzetrigine given pre-operatively decrease the total opioid consumed after total knee replacement surgery? 2. Dose Suzetrigine given pre-operatively decrease the visual analog pain scale pain scores after total knee replacement surgery? Study participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Suzetrigine medication or placebo medication.
Allocation is Randomized, masking is Triple, and the intervention model is Parallel Assignment. Planned enrollment of [object Object] participants across United States shapes statistical precision, execution risk and external validity. Interpretation should account for baseline risk, prior therapy, assessment schedule, missing-data handling and clinical relevance—not only statistical significance.
- Opioid Consumption (5 days) — Total amount of opioid consumption required post-operatively.
Readout outlook and evidence gap
The current protocol points to [object Object] as the best available readout proxy. Because this is an active or newly posted study, a trial-specific result citation is not included until a normalized clinical-trial-result record becomes available. That gap is itself operationally important: teams should monitor first result indexing, conference abstracts, protocol amendments and changes to the primary-completion date.
Build a living trial monitor: connect to PatSnap MCP Servers and track recruitment, endpoint revisions, projected readouts and new result records without manually reconciling separate databases.
Asset and sponsor context
Drug & Asset MCP profile: Suzetrigine is indexed as No normalized modality returned, with target No normalized target returned, mechanism No normalized mechanism returned, and global highest development status No normalized global status returned.
Company & Deal Intelligence MCP profile: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is resolved to a normalized organization record in United States. The organization workflow adds identity, location, portfolio and partnering context where available.
The sponsor profile matters because scientific rationale alone does not determine development value. Manufacturing readiness, portfolio fit, geographic reach, partnering capacity and the ability to fund confirmatory development can determine whether a positive signal becomes a competitive asset.
White space around this program
- Sharper patient selection: prospective biomarker or phenotype definitions that identify who is most likely to benefit.
- Clinically interpretable endpoints: outcomes connecting activity with function, symptoms, survival or treatment burden.
- Comparator relevance: evidence against the most decision-relevant contemporary standard of care.
- Broader external validity: evidence across additional geographies, demographic groups and real-world settings.
- Operational differentiation: a development path that closes the readout gap without sacrificing safety or durability.
What to monitor next
Monitor recruitment, enrollment changes, protocol amendments, endpoint hierarchy, primary-completion timing, first result indexing, asset ownership and sponsor partnerships. A change in endpoint, population or ownership can alter the probability of success before a headline data release.
Bottom line
NCT07548385 provides a focused lens on Pain, Postoperative development. Its value will be determined by whether Suzetrigine can convert the current Phase 3 design into evidence that is clinically meaningful, operationally credible and differentiated from competing programs.
Ready to reproduce this analysis? Explore PatSnap MCP Servers and combine Clinical Trials, Drug & Asset, and Company & Deal Intelligence as reusable building blocks for trial monitoring and SEO-ready clinical reports.
