NCT07562568 Zeprumetostat Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Landscape Report 2026: Design, Endpoints, Sponsor and Readout Outlook

Turn a newly registered trial into a decision-ready clinical landscape. This report examines NCT07562568 using PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP for protocol design and endpoint evidence, with Drug & Asset MCP and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP used as the companion asset and sponsor enrichment workflow. Explore PatSnap MCP Servers to reproduce the research sequence inside an AI workflow.

MCP evidence snapshot: 24 July 2026. Trial records, recruitment status and projected dates can change after the snapshot and should be rechecked before operational decisions.

Why NCT07562568 is a hot trial to watch

Acute Myeloid Leukemia is being segmented by mechanism, treatment setting, geography and endpoint architecture. NCT07562568 is notable because it evaluates Zeprumetostat in a Phase 2 design sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The main development question is whether the protocol can translate its rationale into a clinically interpretable and operationally credible readout.

Trial landscape snapshot

Protocol design and endpoint interpretation

This study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants were patients aged 15-60 years with high-risk or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), diagnosed based on bone marrow morphology, immunophenotyping, genetic testing, and treatment response assessment. The experimental group received SHR2554 combined with azacitidine as an overlapped sequential combination with the TBF conditioning regimen, whereas the control group received the mBuCy conditioning regimen, both followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The primary endpoint was the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after allo-HSCT. Secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), the incidence of acute and chronic g

Allocation is Randomized, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Parallel Assignment. Planned enrollment of [object Object] participants across China shapes statistical precision, execution risk and external validity. Interpretation should account for baseline risk, prior therapy, assessment schedule, missing-data handling and clinical relevance—not only statistical significance.

• Cumulative incidence of relapse（CIR） (2 years) — It is measured the date from complete remission after transplantation to hematological relapse or molecular relapse was recorded. Patients who had no relapse at the last follow-up were considered as censored data, and non-relapse death was regarded as a competing risk event.

Readout outlook and evidence gap

The current protocol points to [object Object] as the best available readout proxy. Because this is an active or newly posted study, a trial-specific result citation is not included until a normalized clinical-trial-result record becomes available. That gap is itself operationally important: teams should monitor first result indexing, conference abstracts, protocol amendments and changes to the primary-completion date.

Build a living trial monitor: connect to PatSnap MCP Servers and track recruitment, endpoint revisions, projected readouts and new result records without manually reconciling separate databases.

Asset and sponsor context

Drug & Asset MCP profile: Zeprumetostat is indexed as Small molecule drug, with target EZH2, mechanism EZH2 inhibitors, Epigenetic drug, and global highest development status Approved.

Company & Deal Intelligence MCP profile: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University did not return an exact normalized organization match in this snapshot. The organization workflow adds identity, location, portfolio and partnering context where available.

The sponsor profile matters because scientific rationale alone does not determine development value. Manufacturing readiness, portfolio fit, geographic reach, partnering capacity and the ability to fund confirmatory development can determine whether a positive signal becomes a competitive asset.

White space around this program

• Sharper patient selection: prospective biomarker or phenotype definitions that identify who is most likely to benefit.
• Clinically interpretable endpoints: outcomes connecting activity with function, symptoms, survival or treatment burden.
• Comparator relevance: evidence against the most decision-relevant contemporary standard of care.
• Broader external validity: evidence across additional geographies, demographic groups and real-world settings.
• Operational differentiation: a development path that closes the readout gap without sacrificing safety or durability.

What to monitor next

Monitor recruitment, enrollment changes, protocol amendments, endpoint hierarchy, primary-completion timing, first result indexing, asset ownership and sponsor partnerships. A change in endpoint, population or ownership can alter the probability of success before a headline data release.

Bottom line

NCT07562568 provides a focused lens on Acute Myeloid Leukemia development. Its value will be determined by whether Zeprumetostat can convert the current Phase 2 design into evidence that is clinically meaningful, operationally credible and differentiated from competing programs.

Ready to reproduce this analysis? Explore PatSnap MCP Servers and combine Clinical Trials, Drug & Asset, and Company & Deal Intelligence as reusable building blocks for trial monitoring and SEO-ready clinical reports.