NCT07634601 Everolimus Metastatic endometrial cancer Clinical Landscape Report 2026: Design, Endpoints, Sponsor and Readout Outlook

Turn a newly registered trial into a decision-ready clinical landscape. This report examines NCT07634601 using PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP for protocol design and endpoint evidence, with Drug & Asset MCP and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP used as the companion asset and sponsor enrichment workflow. Explore PatSnap MCP Servers to reproduce the research sequence inside an AI workflow.

MCP evidence snapshot: 7 August 2026. Trial records, recruitment status and projected dates can change after the snapshot and should be rechecked before operational decisions.

Why NCT07634601 is a hot trial to watch

Metastatic endometrial cancer is being segmented by mechanism, treatment setting, geography and endpoint architecture. NCT07634601 is notable because it evaluates Everolimus in a Phase 2 design sponsored by Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. The main development question is whether the protocol can translate its rationale into a clinically interpretable and operationally credible readout.

Trial landscape snapshot

Protocol design and endpoint interpretation

This phase II trial tests how well elacestrant with everolimus works for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive endometrial cancer that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent), that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Estrogen can cause the growth of cancer cells. Elacestrant lowers the amount of estrogen made by the body. This may help stop the growth of cancer cells that need estrogen to grow. Everolimus is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It is also a type of angiogenesis inhibitor. Everolimus works by stopping cancer cells from reproducing and by decreasing blood supply to the cancer cells. Giving elacestrant with everolimus may be effective for treating patients with recurrent, advanced or metastatic ER posi

Allocation is N/A, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Single Group Assignment. Planned enrollment of [object Object] participants across United States shapes statistical precision, execution risk and external validity. Interpretation should account for baseline risk, prior therapy, assessment schedule, missing-data handling and clinical relevance—not only statistical significance.

• Proportion of patients progression-free (At 24 weeks) — Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the corresponding 95% confidence interval derived using Greenwood's formula.

Readout outlook and evidence gap

The current protocol points to [object Object] as the best available readout proxy. Because this is an active or newly posted study, a trial-specific result citation is not included until a normalized clinical-trial-result record becomes available. That gap is itself operationally important: teams should monitor first result indexing, conference abstracts, protocol amendments and changes to the primary-completion date.

Build a living trial monitor: connect to PatSnap MCP Servers and track recruitment, endpoint revisions, projected readouts and new result records without manually reconciling separate databases.

Asset and sponsor context

Drug & Asset MCP profile: Everolimus is indexed as No normalized modality returned, with target No normalized target returned, mechanism No normalized mechanism returned, and global highest development status No normalized global status returned.

Company & Deal Intelligence MCP profile: Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center is resolved to a normalized organization record in United States. The organization workflow adds identity, location, portfolio and partnering context where available.

The sponsor profile matters because scientific rationale alone does not determine development value. Manufacturing readiness, portfolio fit, geographic reach, partnering capacity and the ability to fund confirmatory development can determine whether a positive signal becomes a competitive asset.

White space around this program

• Sharper patient selection: prospective biomarker or phenotype definitions that identify who is most likely to benefit.
• Clinically interpretable endpoints: outcomes connecting activity with function, symptoms, survival or treatment burden.
• Comparator relevance: evidence against the most decision-relevant contemporary standard of care.
• Broader external validity: evidence across additional geographies, demographic groups and real-world settings.
• Operational differentiation: a development path that closes the readout gap without sacrificing safety or durability.

What to monitor next

Monitor recruitment, enrollment changes, protocol amendments, endpoint hierarchy, primary-completion timing, first result indexing, asset ownership and sponsor partnerships. A change in endpoint, population or ownership can alter the probability of success before a headline data release.

Bottom line

NCT07634601 provides a focused lens on Metastatic endometrial cancer development. Its value will be determined by whether Everolimus can convert the current Phase 2 design into evidence that is clinically meaningful, operationally credible and differentiated from competing programs.

Ready to reproduce this analysis? Explore PatSnap MCP Servers and combine Clinical Trials, Drug & Asset, and Company & Deal Intelligence as reusable building blocks for trial monitoring and SEO-ready clinical reports.