NCT07673341 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bile Duct Neoplasms Clinical Landscape Report 2026: Design, Endpoints, Sponsor and Readout Outlook

Turn a newly registered trial into a decision-ready landscape. This focused report examines NCT07673341—[18F]FTT Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict Treatment Response in Patients Scheduled to Receive Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed Cholangiocarcinoma—using PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP for protocol design and endpoint evidence, Drug & Asset MCP for mechanism and development context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP for sponsor background. Explore PatSnap MCP Servers to reproduce the workflow inside an AI research process.

MCP evidence snapshot: 20 July 2026; publication date: 20 July 2026. Trial records can change after the snapshot and should be rechecked before operational decisions.

Why NCT07673341 is a hot trial to watch

Bile Duct Neoplasms is increasingly segmented by mechanism, biomarker, treatment setting, geography and endpoint architecture. NCT07673341 is notable because it evaluates Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Phase 2 design while Baseline SUVmax will be extracted from a region of interest (ROI) placed on the tumor lesion of interest using a 40% threshold. Will assess overall response rate at 24 ± 2 weeks after starting GCD by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Response will be analyzed as a binary outcome. Differences in baseline SUVmax between responders and non-responders will be evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Logistic regression models will be used to estimate the direction and magnitude of association, with response as the dependent variable and SUVmax as the predictor. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Analysis will focus on estimation of effect sizes and the direction and magnitude of associations of the primary endpoints, overall response rate and SUVmax of the most avid lesion, rather than formal hypothesis testing alone. Boxplots will be used to visualize the distribution of SUVmax by responders group. serves as the main decision variable. The critical question is whether the protocol can convert its rationale into a clinically interpretable and operationally credible readout.

PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP makes protocol fields machine-readable, while the companion asset and organization servers add development-status, target and sponsor context.

Trial landscape snapshot

Design and endpoint interpretation

The phase label is only the starting point. Allocation is N/A, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Single Group Assignment. Planned enrollment of 22 participants across United States shapes statistical precision, execution risk and external validity. Interpretation should account for baseline risk, prior therapy, assessment schedule, missing-data handling and clinical relevance—not only statistical significance.

• Primary: Baseline SUVmax will be extracted from a region of interest (ROI) placed on the tumor lesion of interest using a 40% threshold. Will assess overall response rate at 24 ± 2 weeks after starting GCD by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Response will be analyzed as a binary outcome. Differences in baseline SUVmax between responders and non-responders will be evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Logistic regression models will be used to estimate the direction and magnitude of association, with response as the dependent variable and SUVmax as the predictor. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Analysis will focus on estimation of effect sizes and the direction and magnitude of associations of the primary endpoints, overall response rate and SUVmax of the most avid lesion, rather than formal hypothesis testing alone. Boxplots will be used to visualize the distribution of SUVmax by responders group. (At baseline and 24 weeks after starting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab (GCD))
• Secondary: Will measure baseline SUVmean from an ROI placed on the tumor lesion of interest using a 40% threshold. Treatment response will be defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria at 24 ± 2 weeks following GCD treatment. Association between baseline SUVmean and treatment response will be evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Logistic regression will be used to quantify the magnitude and direction of association between baseline SUVmean and response. Results will be summarized using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and boxplot to illustrate the distribution of baseline SUVmean between responders and non-responders. (At baseline and 24 weeks after starting GCD)
• Secondary: Will calculate the change of SUVmax from baseline to 12 ± 2 weeks after starting GCD. Due to the limited sample size, will use the nonparametric method Wilcoxon Rank Sum test to evaluate the difference in change between responders and non-responders. Effect sizes will be summarized using the median difference (Hodges-Lehmann estimator) in change between groups with 95% confidence intervals. (Baseline to 12 weeks after starting GCD)
• Secondary: Will calculate the change of SUVmean from baseline to 12 ± 2 weeks after starting GCD. Due to the limited sample size, will use the nonparametric method Wilcoxon Rank Sum test to evaluate the difference in change between responders and non-responders. Effect sizes will be summarized using the median difference (Hodges-Lehmann estimator) in change between groups with 95% confidence intervals. (Baseline to 12 weeks after starting GCD)

Benchmark readouts in the surrounding field

• A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Palonosetron HCl Buccal Film Versus IV Palonosetron 0.25 mg for the Prevention of CINV in Cancer Patients Receiving MEC (Phase 2): Complete Acute Response = 4 Participants ; Complete Acute Response = 3 Participants
• Fixed-Dose Netupitant and Palonosetron for Chronic Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients (Phase 2/3): Change in Nausea Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Between Day 5 and Day 15(Mean): P-Value = 0.98; Change in Nausea Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Between Day 5 and Day 15(Mean): P-Value = 0.98
• A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of RDX-002 on Postprandial Triglycerides in Patients Discontinuing the Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonists, Semaglutide, or Tirzepatide for the Treatment of Obesity (Phase 2): Incremental Postprandial Triglycerides (TG)(Mean) = 43.81 percent change (Standard Deviation, 92.373); Incremental Postprandial Triglycerides (TG)(Mean) = -51.91 percent change (Standard Deviation, 72.293)

These indexed results are contextual benchmarks, not direct head-to-head evidence. Population, treatment line, endpoint definitions, follow-up and analysis sets may differ. Their value is to clarify the type and magnitude of evidence already visible in the competitive landscape.

Build a living trial monitor: connect to PatSnap MCP Servers and track status changes, endpoint revisions, primary-completion dates and newly indexed results without manually reconciling separate databases.

Asset and sponsor context

Drug & Asset context: Not reported

Company & Deal Intelligence context: University of Washington — United States — http://www.washington.edu

The sponsor profile matters because scientific rationale alone does not determine development value. Manufacturing readiness, portfolio fit, geographic reach, partnering capacity and the ability to fund confirmatory development can decide whether a positive signal becomes a competitive asset.

White space around this program

• Sharper patient selection: prospective biomarker or phenotype definitions that identify who is most likely to benefit.
• Clinically interpretable endpoints: outcomes connecting activity with function, symptoms, survival or treatment burden.
• Sequencing evidence: comparative data after the most relevant contemporary standard of care.
• Broader external validity: evidence across additional geographies, demographic groups and real-world settings.
• Operational differentiation: a development path that closes the readout gap without sacrificing safety or durability.

What to monitor next

Monitor recruitment, enrollment changes, protocol amendments, endpoint hierarchy, primary-completion timing, first result indexing, asset ownership and sponsor partnerships. A change in endpoint, population or ownership can alter probability of success before a headline data release.

Bottom line

NCT07673341 is a focused lens on Bile Duct Neoplasms development. Its value will be determined by whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging can convert the current design into evidence that is clinically meaningful, operationally credible and differentiated from indexed benchmark readouts.

Ready to reproduce this analysis? Explore PatSnap MCP Servers and combine Clinical Trials, Drug & Asset, and Company & Deal Intelligence as reusable building blocks for trial monitoring and SEO-ready clinical reports.