NCT07679399 Durvalumab Gallbladder Neoplasms Clinical Landscape Report 2026: Design, Endpoints, Sponsor and Readout Outlook
Turn a newly registered trial into a decision-ready clinical landscape. This report examines NCT07679399 using PatSnap Clinical Trials MCP for protocol design and endpoint evidence, with Drug & Asset MCP and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP used as the companion asset and sponsor enrichment workflow. Explore PatSnap MCP Servers to reproduce the research sequence inside an AI workflow.
MCP evidence snapshot: 21 July 2026. Trial records, recruitment status and projected dates can change after the snapshot and should be rechecked before operational decisions.
Why NCT07679399 is a hot trial to watch
Gallbladder Neoplasms is being segmented by mechanism, treatment setting, geography and endpoint architecture. NCT07679399 is notable because it evaluates Durvalumab in a Phase 2 design sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The main development question is whether the protocol can translate its rationale into a clinically interpretable and operationally credible readout.
Trial landscape snapshot
| Field | Indexed detail |
|---|---|
| Registration | NCT07679399 |
| Official title | A Phase II Study of Adjuvant Durvalumab Combined With GEMOX/GC Chemotherapy Followed by Lenvatinib Versus Capecitabine in Biliary Tract Cancer. |
| Phase / status | Phase 2 / Recruiting |
| Intervention | Durvalumab |
| Sponsor | Peking Union Medical College Hospital |
| Geography | China |
| Enrollment | 222 |
| Primary endpoint | 1-year recurrence-free survival |
| Endpoint time frame | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Primary completion / readout proxy | 2027-01-01 |
Protocol design and endpoint interpretation
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab combined with GEMOX/GC chemotherapy followed by lenvatinib, compared with capecitabine monotherapy, as adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative-intent resection.The primary objective is to determine whether the combination regimen can significantly improve the 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Secondary objectives include assessment of overall survival (OS) and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. The overall aim is to identify a more effective and safer treatment strategy for postoperative adjuvant therapy in BTC.
Allocation is Randomized, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Parallel Assignment. Planned enrollment of 222 participants across China shapes statistical precision, execution risk and external validity. Interpretation should account for baseline risk, prior therapy, assessment schedule, missing-data handling and clinical relevance—not only statistical significance.
- 1-year recurrence-free survival (through study completion, an average of 1 year) — 1-year recurrence-free survival refers to the proportion of patients who remain alive and free of disease recurrence at 12 months after the initiation of treatment (e.g., surgery or start of systemic therapy).
Readout outlook and evidence gap
The current protocol points to 2027-01-01 as the best available readout proxy. Because this is an active or newly posted study, a trial-specific result citation is not included until a normalized clinical-trial-result record becomes available. That gap is itself operationally important: teams should monitor first result indexing, conference abstracts, protocol amendments and changes to the primary-completion date.
Build a living trial monitor: connect to PatSnap MCP Servers and track recruitment, endpoint revisions, projected readouts and new result records without manually reconciling separate databases.
Asset and sponsor context
Trial-sourced asset: Durvalumab. The Drug & Asset MCP enrichment step is designed to add normalized targets, modality and global development status when an exact asset match is available.
Trial-sourced sponsor: Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Company & Deal Intelligence MCP is the companion workflow for resolving organization identity, corporate profile and partnering context.
The sponsor profile matters because scientific rationale alone does not determine development value. Manufacturing readiness, portfolio fit, geographic reach, partnering capacity and the ability to fund confirmatory development can determine whether a positive signal becomes a competitive asset.
White space around this program
- Sharper patient selection: prospective biomarker or phenotype definitions that identify who is most likely to benefit.
- Clinically interpretable endpoints: outcomes connecting activity with function, symptoms, survival or treatment burden.
- Comparator relevance: evidence against the most decision-relevant contemporary standard of care.
- Broader external validity: evidence across additional geographies, demographic groups and real-world settings.
- Operational differentiation: a development path that closes the readout gap without sacrificing safety or durability.
What to monitor next
Monitor recruitment, enrollment changes, protocol amendments, endpoint hierarchy, primary-completion timing, first result indexing, asset ownership and sponsor partnerships. A change in endpoint, population or ownership can alter the probability of success before a headline data release.
Bottom line
NCT07679399 provides a focused lens on Gallbladder Neoplasms development. Its value will be determined by whether Durvalumab can convert the current Phase 2 design into evidence that is clinically meaningful, operationally credible and differentiated from competing programs.
Ready to reproduce this analysis? Explore PatSnap MCP Servers and combine Clinical Trials, Drug & Asset, and Company & Deal Intelligence as reusable building blocks for trial monitoring and SEO-ready clinical reports.
