Ivonescimab in Renal Cell Carcinoma: NCT07226544 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace
This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.
Data snapshot: 18 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.
Phase 2
Clinical phase
Recruiting
Recruitment status
31
Planned enrollment
2027-09-08
Primary-completion proxy
Executive view
NCT07226544 evaluates Ivonescimab in Renal Cell Carcinoma. The disclosed sponsor is City of Hope National Medical Center, the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is United States. The first listed primary endpoint is Proportion of patients achieving a best overall response (ORR), assessed over Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment.
The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.
PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.
How the MCP evidence stack was assembled
Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT07226544 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Renal Cell Carcinoma landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for Ivonescimab, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for City of Hope National Medical Center.
This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.
Trial landscape table
| Trial | Asset / intervention | Phase / status | Sponsor | Geography | Primary endpoint | Readout proxy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT07226544 | Ivonescimab | Phase 2 / Recruiting | City of Hope National Medical Center | United States | Proportion of patients achieving a best overall response (ORR) Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment | 2027-09-08 |
| NCT07438626 | Sacituzumab tirumotecan | Phase 2 / Not yet recruiting | The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | United States | Safety and adverse events (AEs). Through study completion; an average of 1 year. | 2028-06-01 |
| NCT07419841 | CTX-10726 | Phase 1 / Recruiting | Compass Therapeutics, Inc. | United States | Cohort 1: Evaluate the safety and tolerability of CTX-10726 by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) i… From first dose of CTX-10726 (Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle = 2 weeks) until 3… | 2028-04-01 |
| NCT07401875 | Ipilimumab | Phase 1 / Recruiting | The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | United States | Safety and adverse events (AEs) Through study completion; an average of 1 year | 2027-11-30 |
| NCT07397611 | Zimberelimab | Phase 2 / Recruiting | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. | United States | Tumor Size Reduction Rate Disease assessment will occur at pre-surgery visit week 11 ± 2 weeks. | 2028-01-31 |
The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.
Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP
Protocol design and endpoint interpretation
NCT07226544 is a Phase 2, recruiting study with 31 planned participants. Allocation is N/A, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Single Group Assignment.
The primary endpoint is “Proportion of patients achieving a best overall response (ORR)” over “Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment.” The retrieved endpoint description is: Objective response is defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The ORR will be estimated as the proportion of patients who have CR or PR during the treatment, along with the 90% and 95% exact confidence intervals..
Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 31 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.
No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.
Indexed readouts in the surrounding landscape
5 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Renal Cell Carcinoma. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT07226544 unless the registration number matches.
Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Renal Medullary Carcinoma
Phase 2; n=10; ORR = 0 Participants Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03274258
High Dose IL-2 in Combination With Anti-PD-1 to Overcome Anti-PD-1 Resistance in Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma
Phase 2; n=6; ORR = 1 Participants Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03991130
A Phase Ib/II Open Label, Multi-arm, Parallel Cohort Dose Finding and Expansion Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of NUC-3373, a Nucleotide Analogue, Given…
Phase 1/2; n=19; Number of Participants With DLTs in Each Module = 0 Participants ; Number of Participants With DLTs in Each Module = 0 Participants Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT05714553
Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.
Asset and sponsor context
Ivonescimab is indexed as Bispecific antibody with PD-1 x VEGF-A biology and a global stage of Approved. The asset profile lists Akeso Biopharma Co., Ltd. as an originator or developer.
City of Hope National Medical Center is indexed in United States with the website http://www.cityofhope.org. City of Hope is a cancer research and treatment non-profit organization specializing in diabetes and other life-threatening illnesses. The record lists 103 development-stage drug assets.
For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.
Development white space
- Endpoint white space. Determine whether a more patient-relevant outcome, longer durability window or blinded central assessment would resolve uncertainty left by the current endpoint.
- Population white space. Test biomarker-defined, treatment-line or risk-stratified subgroups where effect size and unmet need could be clearer.
- Comparator white space. Identify whether the study can support differentiation against the current standard of care rather than only activity against baseline or placebo.
- Geographic white space. Assess whether the disclosed footprint supports recruitment, regulatory transferability and commercial generalizability.
- Sequencing white space. Clarify whether Ivonescimab is intended for monotherapy, combination, maintenance, rescue or an earlier treatment line.
White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.
Strategic implications and next readouts
For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.
For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.
Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.
Source trail and bottom line
Anchor trial: NCT07226544
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07226544
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 18 September 2026.
Ivonescimab in Renal Cell Carcinoma is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes Proportion of patients achieving a best overall response (ORR) and 2027-09-08 the leading decision points.
Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP
