Velinotamig in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: NCT07348055 Clinical Landscape Report 2026

18 September 2026
9 min read

PatSnap Open Platform MCP servers
Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace

This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.

Data snapshot: 18 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.

Phase 1/2

Clinical phase

Recruiting

Recruitment status

44

Planned enrollment

2027-06-01

Primary-completion proxy

Executive view

NCT07348055 evaluates Velinotamig in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. The disclosed sponsor is Zhixiang (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd., the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is China. The first listed primary endpoint is incidence of adverse event, assessed over 52 week.

The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.

PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.

How the MCP evidence stack was assembled

Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT07348055 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Systemic Lupus Erythematosus landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for Velinotamig, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for Zhixiang (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd..

This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.

Trial landscape table

TrialAsset / interventionPhase / statusSponsorGeographyPrimary endpointReadout proxy
NCT07348055VelinotamigPhase 1/2 / RecruitingZhixiang (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd.Chinaincidence of adverse event
52 week
2027-06-01
NCT07516639ISH-0613Phase 1 / Not yet recruitingSunho (China) Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.ChinaNumber of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v6.0
baseline through day 57
2026-12-31
NCT07517536CHT-105Not Applicable / Enrolling by invitationNanjing Drum Tower HospitalChinaSafety of CHT105 Injection in Subjects with Refractory Lupus Nephritis
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 52 weeks
2028-01-01
NCT07512947YK012Phase 1 / Not yet recruitingWuhan Xiehe Hospital TowerChinaIncidence of Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
From first dose through Day 35
2028-03-30
NCT07507201Universal allogeneic anti-CD19/BCMA CAR T-cells(The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine)Early Phase 1 / RecruitingThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineChinaIncidence of Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Day 0 to Day 28 post-infusion.
2028-12-01

The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.

PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers
Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP

Protocol design and endpoint interpretation

NCT07348055 is a Phase 1/2, recruiting study with 44 planned participants. Allocation is Non-Randomized, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Sequential Assignment.

The primary endpoint is “incidence of adverse event” over “52 week.” The retrieved endpoint description is: incidence of adverse event.

Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 44 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.

No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.

Indexed readouts in the surrounding landscape

5 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT07348055 unless the registration number matches.

A PHASE 2, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL EFFECT, PHARMACODYNAMIC, PHARMACOKINETIC AND SAFETY PROFILE OF PF 06823859 IN A…

Phase 2; n=8; Change From Baseline in Type 1 Interferon (IFN) Gene Signature (GS) Score in Lesional Skin at Week 12(Least Squares Mean): Least Square Mean Difference = 0.5(90% CI, -3.7 to 4.6), P-Value = 0.8243; Change From Baseline in Type 1 Interferon (IFN) Gene Signature (GS) Score in Lesional Skin at Week 12(Least Squares Mean): Least Square Mean Difference = 0.5(90% CI, -3.7 to 4.6), P-Value = 0.8243 Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT05879718

A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-6194 in Adult Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Phase 2; n=149; Number of Participants Achieving Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI-4) Response at Week 28 = 10 Participants ; Number of Participants Achieving Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI-4) Response at Week 28 = 15 Participants Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT06161116

Dapagliflozin in lupus nephritis: renal and hematologic outcomes from a randomized controlled trial

Phase 2; n=79; eGFR = -2.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 Source: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/42549085/

Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.

Asset and sponsor context

Velinotamig is indexed as Bispecific T-cell Engager (BiTE) with BCMA x CD3 biology and a global stage of Approved. The asset profile lists Zhixiang (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd. as an originator or developer.

Zhixiang (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd. is indexed in China with the website http://www.genrixbio.com. The organization record is used to resolve sponsor identity. The record lists 3 development-stage drug assets.

For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.

Development white space

  1. Endpoint white space. Determine whether a more patient-relevant outcome, longer durability window or blinded central assessment would resolve uncertainty left by the current endpoint.
  2. Population white space. Test biomarker-defined, treatment-line or risk-stratified subgroups where effect size and unmet need could be clearer.
  3. Comparator white space. Identify whether the study can support differentiation against the current standard of care rather than only activity against baseline or placebo.
  4. Geographic white space. Assess whether the disclosed footprint supports recruitment, regulatory transferability and commercial generalizability.
  5. Sequencing white space. Clarify whether Velinotamig is intended for monotherapy, combination, maintenance, rescue or an earlier treatment line.

White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.

Strategic implications and next readouts

For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.

For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.

Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.

Source trail and bottom line

Anchor trial: NCT07348055
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07348055
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 18 September 2026.

Velinotamig in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes incidence of adverse event and 2027-06-01 the leading decision points.

Explore PatSnap MCP Servers
Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP

Iparomlimab/Tuvonralimab in Mucosal Melanoma: NCT07347444 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
9 min read
Iparomlimab/Tuvonralimab in Mucosal Melanoma: NCT07347444 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
18 September 2026
NCT07347444 clinical landscape for Mucosal Melanoma: endpoints, sponsor, phase, geography, readouts, asset context and development white space.
Read →
Fluzoparib in Breast Cancer: NCT07353437 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
9 min read
Fluzoparib in Breast Cancer: NCT07353437 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
18 September 2026
NCT07353437 clinical landscape for Breast Cancer: endpoints, sponsor, phase, geography, readouts, asset context and development white space.
Read →
Pucotenlimab in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: NCT07353073 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
9 min read
Pucotenlimab in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: NCT07353073 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
18 September 2026
NCT07353073 clinical landscape for Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck: endpoints, sponsor, phase, geography, readouts, asset context and development white…
Read →
Sintilimab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: NCT07351487 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
9 min read
Sintilimab in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: NCT07351487 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
18 September 2026
NCT07351487 clinical landscape for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: endpoints, sponsor, phase, geography, readouts, asset context and development white space.
Read →
Get started for free today!
Accelerate Strategic R&D decision making with Synapse, Patsnap’s AI-powered Connected Innovation Intelligence Platform Built for Life Sciences Professionals.
Discover Synapse Data Servers
Synapse data is now integrated into the PatSnap LS Model Context Protocol (MCP) service. Customize your LLM agent now using our MCP server!