This Evobrutinib Drug Asset Due Diligence Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Drug & Asset MCP establishes identity, ownership and stage; Clinical Trials MCP checks design, endpoints and readouts; Company & Deal Intelligence MCP reconstructs transaction precedent. Explore the MCP servers used in this report.
Decision date: 15 July 2026. Currency fields are presented in US$ millions as returned by the deal dataset. This is a screening memorandum, not legal, medical, patent or investment advice.
Discontinued
Highest phase
24
Registered trials
26
Result records
39
Matched deals
Preserve optionality until clinical differentiation, transaction economics, and freedom-to-operate are sufficiently de-risked.
The central underwriting question is whether Evobrutinib can convert its Small molecule drug profile and BTK biology into clinically meaningful differentiation while preserving an investable safety, IP and commercial position.
| Asset | Evobrutinib (query alias: evobrutinib) |
|---|---|
| Modality / target | Small molecule drug; BTK; BTK inhibitors |
| Highest global status | Discontinued |
| Originator | Merck Serono SA |
| Active developers | Not disclosed |
The MCP disease footprint includes no disclosed indication. The highest-phase flag is a useful orientation point, but the licensing case depends on indication-level evidence and rights, not the global label alone.
| Registry | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Lead primary endpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05245396 | Phase 1 | Completed | 58 | Relative Bioavailability Based on Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post Dose [Frel(AUC0-24)] of Evobrutinib Modified-Release Formulation Compared to Immediate-Release Evobrutinib Reference Formulation |
| NCT07214935 | Phase 1 | Completed | 36 | Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia' Formula (QTcF) for Evobrutinib |
| NCT07215806 | Phase 1 | Completed | 20 | Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Ethinyl Estradiol and Norethisterone |
The trial set should be diligenced for randomization, comparator relevance, endpoint hierarchy, analysis population, multiplicity, geographic mix and readout timing. For early-stage studies, safety and dose selection can be as decision-critical as response rate.

Reproduce the asset-to-trial workflow with PatSnap MCP
Phase 1; n=14; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Evobrutinib(Geometric Mean) = 49.2 Hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Coefficient of Variation, 23.1); Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Evobrutinib(Geometric Mean) = 310 Hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Coefficient of Variation, 33.2); Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Evobrutinib(Geometric Mean): Ratio of test and reference treatment = 15.83(90% CI, 13.26 - 18.90)
Phase 1; n=40; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin(Geometric Mean) = 18.7 Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Coefficient of Variation, 23.7); Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin(Geometric Mean): Ratio = 118.49(90% CI, 111.89 - 125.47); Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin(Geometric Mean): Ratio = 118.49(90% CI, 111.89 - 125.47)
Phase 1; n=20; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: Ethinyl Estradiol(Geometric Mean) = 1090 hour × picogram per milliliter (h×pg/mL) (Geometric Coefficient of Variation, 26.7); -; -
These fields are structured evidence signals, not a substitute for statistical review. The next diligence pass should reconcile denominators, confidence intervals, follow-up, censoring, dose cohorts and treatment-emergent toxicity against the original abstract, registry and protocol.
Evobrutinib addresses its disclosed development indications. Commercial attractiveness rests on addressable biomarker-positive patients, treatment-line placement, duration, administration burden, pricing and displacement of entrenched standards. The modality—Small molecule drug—must demonstrate a benefit large enough to offset class-specific safety and operational costs.
The strongest market-validation signal in this screen is partner behavior: 39 matched transaction record(s) indicate that sophisticated counterparties have assigned strategic value to the asset or its rights. That does not establish net present value; probability of success, remaining R&D spend, royalties, cost sharing and territorial scope still need modeling.
Transaction-scope note: No direct asset-specific transaction was returned. The table below shows target-level comparable: BTK records as comparable precedents only.
| Date | Transaction | Phase at deal | Disclosed economics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | Roche and Nurix Therapeutics to partner in $2.3bn deal | Phase 3 | US$2,300.0M stated total |
| 2026-06-02 | Travere Therapeutics Enters Into Exclusive Licensing Agreement with Everest Medicines for Civorebrutinib a Potential Best-in-Class BTK Inhibitor for Rare Kidney Diseases | Phase 2 | US$112.5M upfront; US$1,030.0M milestones |
| 2026-05-14 | Aptose, facing cash crunch, exits blood cancer pact after Hanmi buyout blocks development | Phase 1 | Financial terms not disclosed |
Headline values are not directly comparable. Diligence should normalize upfront cash, equity, development and sales milestones, tiered royalties, opt-in mechanics, cost sharing, change-of-control clauses and geography.
The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Methods for treating sickle cell disease by administering a BTK inhibitor”. The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “BTK inhibitors to treat pulmonary distress in covid-19 patients”.
The claim chart should separately test composition or sequence coverage, formulation and dosing, indication and biomarker claims, combinations, manufacturing know-how, prosecution history, term extensions and third-party blocking rights. Confirm that licensed patents, data and know-how track every granted territory and field.
Cross-functional diligence should also test CMC comparability, supply chain, pharmacovigilance, regulatory correspondence, data integrity, investigator concentration, partner obligations and change-of-control restrictions.
Preserve optionality until clinical differentiation, transaction economics, and freedom-to-operate are sufficiently de-risked.
Required pre-signing gates: reproduce key efficacy analyses; complete an indication-specific safety review; run a full patent-family and freedom-to-operate search; model risk-adjusted economics by territory; and reconcile all rights, sublicenses and encumbrances.
Build your next drug-asset diligence workflow with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers
Data provenance: PatSnap Drug & Asset MCP, Clinical Trials MCP, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP; accessed 15 July 2026. Counts and status fields may change as source records update.