Telaglenastat Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go

18 September 2026
8 min read

PatSnap Open Platform MCP servers

This Telaglenastat Drug Asset Due Diligence Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Drug & Asset MCP establishes identity, ownership and stage; Clinical Trials MCP checks design, endpoints and readouts; Company & Deal Intelligence MCP reconstructs transaction precedent. Explore the MCP servers used in this report.

Decision date: 18 September 2026. Currency fields are presented in US$ millions as returned by the deal dataset. This is a screening memorandum, not legal, medical, patent or investment advice.

Phase 2
Highest phase
24
Registered trials
27
Result records
2
Matched deals

Executive recommendation: CONDITIONAL GO

Decision memo

Advance with milestone-based economics while efficacy durability, safety differentiation, patent scope, and market positioning are validated.

The central underwriting question is whether Telaglenastat can convert its Small molecule drug profile and GLS1 biology into clinically meaningful differentiation while preserving an investable safety, IP and commercial position.

1. Asset identity and development status

AssetTelaglenastat (query alias: Telaglenastat)
Modality / targetSmall molecule drug; GLS1; GLS1 inhibitors
Highest global statusPhase 2
OriginatorCalithera Biosciences, Inc.
Active developersNational Cancer Institute, Synhale Therapeutics, University of Coimbra

The MCP disease footprint includes Advanced Cervical Carcinoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Solid Tumor. The highest-phase flag is a useful orientation point, but the licensing case depends on indication-level evidence and rights, not the global label alone.

2. Clinical program: design and endpoint audit

RegistryPhaseStatusEnrollmentLead primary endpoint
NCT07223528Phase 1/2Not yet recruiting28Primary endpoint not disclosed in English source
NCT05521997Phase 2Not yet recruiting42Primary endpoint not disclosed in English source
NCT04824937Phase 2Unknown status30Primary endpoint not disclosed in English source

The trial set should be diligenced for randomization, comparator relevance, endpoint hierarchy, analysis population, multiplicity, geographic mix and readout timing. For early-stage studies, safety and dose selection can be as decision-critical as response rate.

PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers
Reproduce the asset-to-trial workflow with PatSnap MCP

3. Clinical readouts: what is known

A Phase 1 Trial of MLN0128 (Sapanisertib) and CB-839 HCl (Telaglenastat) in Advanced NSCLC Patients

Phase 1; n=22; evaluation: Not stated in English source. Reported fields: Maximum Tolerated Dose/Recommended Phase II Dose of MLN0128 (Sapanisertib) and CB-839 HCl (Telaglenastat) in Combination (Dose-escalation) = NA mg

A Phase Ib Study of Osimertinib (AZD9291) and Telaglenastat (CB-839) HCl in Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Phase 1/2; n=22; evaluation: Not stated in English source. Reported fields: Telaglenastat (CB-839) HCl = 800 mg ; Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events = 3 Pts

Phase I/II Study of CB-839 and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Fluoropyrimidine Resistant PIK3CA Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Phase 1/2; n=50; evaluation: Not stated in English source. Reported fields: PHASE I: Recommended Dose for Phase II Study = 1,000 mg/m^2 ; PHASE II: Progression-free Survival (PFS) = 0 Pts

These fields are structured evidence signals, not a substitute for statistical review. The next diligence pass should reconcile denominators, confidence intervals, follow-up, censoring, dose cohorts and treatment-emergent toxicity against the original abstract, registry and protocol.

4. Market and competitive position

Telaglenastat addresses Advanced Cervical Carcinoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Solid Tumor. Commercial attractiveness rests on addressable patients, treatment-line placement, duration, administration burden, pricing and displacement of entrenched standards. The modality—Small molecule drug—must demonstrate a benefit large enough to offset class-specific safety and operational costs.

The MCP screen returned 2 matched transaction record(s) under the scope “asset-specific.” Partner activity is a market-validation signal, but it does not establish net present value.

5. Transaction precedent and economics

DateTransactionPhase at dealDisclosed economics
2025-05-01Synhale Therapeutics Acquires Telaglenastat, Accelerates Development for Pulmonary Hypertension TreatmentPhase 2Financial terms not disclosed
2018-10-05Calithera Biosciences Announces Clinical Trial Collaboration To Evaluate IBRANCE® (palbociclib) And talazoparib In Combination With CB-839Phase 2Financial terms not disclosed

Headline values are not directly comparable. Diligence should normalize upfront cash, equity, development and sales milestones, tiered royalties, opt-in mechanics, cost sharing, change-of-control clauses and geography.

6. IP and freedom-to-operate screen

The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Pharmaceutical composition containing GLS1 inhibitor and AMPK activator and application thereof”. The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Treatment of cancer with a met kinase inhibitor”. The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Compositions and methods for administering a YAP1/WWRT1 inhibiting composition and a GLS1 inhibiting composition”.

The claim chart should separately test composition or sequence coverage, formulation and dosing, indication and biomarker claims, combinations, manufacturing know-how, prosecution history, term extensions and third-party blocking rights.

7. Principal risks and diligence gates

  • Therapeutic index and off-target toxicity
  • Resistance biology and biomarker-defined patient selection
  • Differentiation from established and emerging standards

Cross-functional diligence should also test CMC comparability, supply chain, pharmacovigilance, regulatory correspondence, data integrity, investigator concentration, partner obligations and change-of-control restrictions.

8. Final go/no-go memorandum

CONDITIONAL GO

Advance with milestone-based economics while efficacy durability, safety differentiation, patent scope, and market positioning are validated.

Required pre-signing gates: reproduce key efficacy analyses; complete an indication-specific safety review; run a full patent-family and freedom-to-operate search; model risk-adjusted economics by territory; and reconcile all rights, sublicenses and encumbrances.

Explore PatSnap MCP Servers

Build your next drug-asset diligence workflow with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers


Data provenance: PatSnap Drug & Asset MCP, Clinical Trials MCP, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP; accessed 2026-09-18. Counts and status fields may change as source records update.

VR-103 Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
8 min read
VR-103 Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
18 September 2026
VR-103: Phase 2. 2026 diligence verdict: HOLD / OPTION. Evidence review covers clinical development, IP, licensing deals, market position, and key risks.
Read →
Aflibercept/Nesvacumab Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
8 min read
Aflibercept/Nesvacumab Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
18 September 2026
Aflibercept/Nesvacumab: Phase 2. 2026 diligence verdict: CONDITIONAL GO. Evidence review covers clinical development, IP, licensing deals, market.
Read →
Recombinant annexin A5 (Annexin Pharmaceuticals) Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
8 min read
Recombinant annexin A5 (Annexin Pharmaceuticals) Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
18 September 2026
Recombinant annexin A5 (Annexin Pharmaceuticals): Phase 2. 2026 diligence verdict: HOLD / OPTION. Evidence review covers clinical development, IP.
Read →
Froctose Biphosphate Magnesium Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
8 min read
Froctose Biphosphate Magnesium Drug Asset Due Diligence Report 2026: Clinical, IP, Market, Deals, and Go/No-Go
18 September 2026
Froctose Biphosphate Magnesium: Phase 2. 2026 diligence verdict: HOLD / OPTION. Evidence review covers clinical development, IP, licensing deals, market.
Read →
Get started for free today!
Accelerate Strategic R&D decision making with Synapse, Patsnap’s AI-powered Connected Innovation Intelligence Platform Built for Life Sciences Professionals.
Discover Synapse Data Servers
Synapse data is now integrated into the PatSnap LS Model Context Protocol (MCP) service. Customize your LLM agent now using our MCP server!