Carcinoid Tumors, Intestinal

An international multi-centre, open, randomised, parallel-group phase II study comparing adjuvant treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE to best supportive care in patients after complete surgical removal of neuroendocrine liver metastases.
In this study, adjuvant treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE will be compared with best supportive care in patients with well differentiated grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumours in the stomach, pancreas or gut (gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs) who had their primary tumour already removed or in whom both primary and liver tumour metastases removal will take place simultaneously, including removal of perihilar lymph nodes will be eligible.
The primary objective is to compare overall disease-free survival at 3 years after treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE to best supportive care between both treatment arms, with equal chances of entering either arm (1:1)
Secondary objectives are to describe and compare the difference in disease-free survival in the liver, overall survival, time to the next anticancer treatment, the cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life. The safety and toxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE as adjuvant therapy will also be described.
Additionally, the clinical use of blood and urine analysis test (NETest) will be evaluated to identify microscopic remaining disease and detect early the return of the tumour.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory dose response of paltusotine treatment in subjects with carcinoid syndrome. This study consists of a Randomized Treatment Phase followed by an Open-Label Extension (OLE) Phase.

Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain.
To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.