LAU-0901

We tested the hypothesis that blocking pro-inflammatory platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) with LAU-0901 (LAU) plus administering a selected docosanoid, aspirin-triggered neuroprotectin D1 (AT-NPD1), which activates cell-survival pathways after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo), would lead to neurological recovery. Dose-response and therapeutic window were investigated.

Male SD rats were subjected to 2 hours of MCAo. Behavior testing (days 1-7) and ex vivo MRI on day 7 were conducted. In dose-response, rats were treated with LAU (45 and 60 mg/kg; IP), AT-NPD1 (111, 222, 333 µg/kg; IV), LAU+AT-NPD1 (LAU at 3 hours and AT-NPD1 at 3.15 hours) or vehicle. In the therapeutic window, vehicle, LAU (60 mg/kg), AT-NPD1 (222 µg/kg), and LAU+AT-NPD1 were administered at 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after onset of MCAo.

LAU and AT-NPD1 treatments alone improved behavior by 40-42% and 20-30%, respectively, and LAU+AT-NPD1 by 40% compared to the vehicle group. T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) volumes were reduced with all doses of LAU and AT-NPD1 by 73-90% and 67-83% and LAU+AT-NPD1 by 94% compared to vehicle. In the therapeutic window, LAU+AT-NPD1, when administered at 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours, improved behavior by 50, 56, 33, and 26% and reduced T2WI volumes by 93, 90, 82, and 84% compared to vehicle.

We have shown here for the first time that LAU plus AT-NPD1 treatment affords high-grade neuroprotection in MCAo, equaling or exceeding that afforded by LAU or AT-NPD1 alone at considerably moderate doses. It has a broad therapeutic window extending to 6 hours after stroke onset.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most invasive type of glial tumor with poor overall survival, despite advances in surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. One of the main challenges in treating GBM is related to the tumor’s location, complex and heterogeneous biology, and high invasiveness. To meet the demand for oxygen and nutrients, growing tumors induce new blood vessels growth. Antibodies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis, have been developed to limit tumor growth. Bevacizumab (Avastin), an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, is the first approved angiogenesis inhibitor with therapeutic promise. However, it has limited efficacy, likely due to adaptive mutations in GBM, leading to overall survival compared to the standard of care in GBM patients. Molecular connections between angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress pathways, and the development of gliomas have been recognized. Improvement in treatment outcomes for patients with GBM requires a multifaceted approach due to the converging dysregulation of signaling pathways. While most GBM clinical trials focus on “anti-angiogenic” modalities, stimulating inflammation resolution is a novel host-centric therapeutic avenue. The selective therapeutic possibilities for targeting the tumor microenvironment, specifically angiogenic and inflammatory pathways expand. So, a combination of agents aiming to interfere with several mechanisms might be beneficial to improve outcomes. Our approach might also be combined with other therapies to enhance sustained effectiveness. Here, we discuss Suramab (anti-angiogenic), LAU-0901 (a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist), Elovanoid (ELV; a novel lipid mediator), and their combination as potential alternatives to contain GBM growth and invasiveness.