Isopropamide Iodide

Intravenous injection of arabinogalactan or dextran together with pontamine sky-blue dye into mice increased vascular permeability and led to marked blueing of the ears. Arabinogalactan caused a rapidly progressing ear blueing (maximal coloration 20-30 min after injection). This response was suppressed by pretreating the animals with the histamine H1-antihistamines levocabastine and loratadine. In contrast, dextran induced a slowly evolving ear inflammation (maximal coloration 60-90 min after injection), which was blocked by the 5-HT-serotonin antagonists cinanserin, metergoline and ritanserin. Furthermore, the dextran reaction was inhibited by the lipoxygenase (LO)/cyclooxygenase (CO) inhibitors BW540C, BW755C and phenidone and by the specific 5-LO inhibitor AA-861. Both arabinogalactan and dextran responses were inhibited by aprotinin, a kallikrein inhibitor, and the mixed H1/5-HT antagonists astemizole and azatadine. The inflammogenic activity of the polysaccharides was not affected by administration of the CO inhibitors indomethacin and suprofen, the thromboxane synthetase inhibitor dazoxiben, the H2-antihistamines cimetidine and ranitidine, the anticholinergics isopropamide or the PAF-antagonist L-652, 731. These data indicate the existence of distinctive endogenous molecules that mediate the pinnal extravasation reaction to both polysaccharides: histamine for arabinogalactan, serotonin and lipoxygenase-derived arachidonic acid metabolites for dextran.

The affinity of a number of ‘selective’ agonists and antagonists has been assessed at atrial or ileal muscarinic receptors by use of in vitro functional analysis.The most selective compound for ileal muscarinic receptors was silabenzhexol (approx. 50 fold), and to a lesser extent benzhexol (approx. 5 fold). Conversely, the most selective compound for the atrial muscarinic receptors was AF‐DX 116 (approx. 6 fold).The novel M1‐receptor antagonist, telenzepine and other antagonists such as propantheline and isopropamide did not distinguish between atrial and ileal receptors.Dicyclomine, adiphenine, hexahydroadiphenine and oxyphenonium exhibited competitive antagonism at atrial receptors but non‐competitive antagonism at ileal receptors. No conclusions could, therefore, be drawn with regard to their selectivity.The agonists, arecaidine propargyl ester (APE), ethoxyethyltriethylammonium (EOE) and carbachol, exhibited some selectivity in potency but little difference in affinity.It is concluded that the study supports the existence of ileal and atrial muscarinic receptor subtypes. However, the use of dicyclomine and related compounds in receptor classification is limited.