INTRODUCTIONIschemic heart disease (IHD) is a prominent contributor to mortality worldwide, with myocardial infarction (MI) representing its most severe manifestation. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) treatment shows promise for treating IHD. Nevertheless, the therapeutic impact and underlying mechanism of PEMF in MI are not fully understood.OBJECTIVESTo investigate the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of PEMF for MI.METHODSWe established MI models in both mice and pigs and performed serial echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance follow-up to demonstrate the benefit of PEMF treatment after MI. The pathological environment after myocardial infarction was simulated in vitro to observe changes in various cells exposed to PEMF. Gene knockout (TLR4-/-) mice and inhibitors were used to compare the differences in the efficacy of PEMF treatment relative to that of gene knockout/inhibitor treatments. Agonists were used to further explore the mechanism of PEMF treatment.RESULTSIn post-MI mice, PEMF treatment enhanced cardiac function and reduced scar formation. PEMF reduced the macrophage inflammatory response, improved cardiomyocyte survival in an inflammatory environment, and decreased collagen secretion by fibroblasts in vitro. Importantly, in the clinically relevant porcine model, PEMF treatment inhibited the inflammatory response and alleviated adverse left ventricular remodeling. Moreover, PEMF could exert therapeutic effects similar to those of gene knockout or inhibitor treatments. In the presence of TLR4 knockout or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (an NF-κB inhibitor) administration, PEMF could still improve cardiac function in post-MI mice. Mechanistically, the anti-inflammatory effect of PEMF was reversed when RS09 (a TLR4 agonist) was administered, and the antifibrotic effect of PEMF was attenuated after treatment with SRI-011381 (a TGF-β signaling pathway agonist).CONCLUSIONSPEMF treatment exhibits considerable promise as a noninvasive physical therapy modality, warranting further investigation into its potential implications for managing patients with IHD.