EG COVID vaccine (EyeGene)

We explored HPV vaccine concerns and healthcare provider communication among Hispanic/Latinx hesitant parents during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how those concerns and provider communications compared for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. As a secondary aim, we explored communication needs and strategies for these recommended vaccines.

We applied a concurrent, multi-method study design (survey and interview) with 23 Hispanic/Latinx American parents of adolescents aged 11-18 years. An inductive deductive thematic approach was used to interpret interview data. Descriptives were used to analyze survey data.

Overall, most parents (77%) perceived that their child was receiving too many vaccines. Regarding hesitancy for the HPV vaccine, major parental concerns related to vaccine effectiveness (83%), vaccine necessity (83%), and vaccine safety (80%). For the COVID vaccine, major concerns were the newness of vaccine (83%), vaccine safety (77%), low perceived effectiveness (77%), and low perceived need (77%). For influenza vaccines, major parental concerns were vaccine safety (73%), low perceived need (73%), and preference for natural over vaccine-induced immunity (73%). Parents had overall positive views towards vaccination. Some parents prioritized school-required vaccines, and others ranked the recommended vaccines- HPV, COVID-19, and influenza vaccines- for their children. They saw the benefits of recommended vaccines; however, there were concerns. The majority received a provider's recommendation for HPV vaccination for their child, while over half had not received a recommendation for COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. Recommended communication strategies were diverse with parents highlighting the need for providers to capitalize on waiting and clinic rooms to provide education.

Healthcare providers should take advantage of missed opportunities, improve healthcare interactions with a strong recommendation and persistent communication, and offer diverse communication strategies and messaging for vaccines. Future work should further explore multi-vaccine concerns and how addressing these concerns through healthcare-provider communication could improve HPV vaccination along with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination.

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is an important clinical entity that is rare and may develop with a Type IV delayed type hypersensitivity immune response to drug antigens. The incidence and characteristics of SDRIFE attributed to COronaVIrus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines remain unclear, this issue requires further elucidation.

We aim to investigate the vaccine-related-SDRIFE and potential immunogens of COVID-19 vaccines through a literature review accompanied by a real case.

A new vaccine related-SDRIFE case report and a literature review regarding COVID Vaccine related SDRIFE. In the years following the COVID vaccinations, all SDRIFE cases published between 2000 and 2024 were retrieved.

The new case of vaccine-related SDRIFE developed following the COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and was tolerated without any issues with the CoronaVac vaccine (Sinovac Biotech.,China) after negative skin tests. A literature search has revealed fifteen different types of SDRIFE cases related to COVID-19 vaccines since 2020. Diagnostic skin testing with vaccine or any potentially immunogen parts of vaccine were performed in six patients. All tests were negative except for one late intradermal test positivity.

This mini review showed that SDRIFE due to COVID vaccines is a rare, but a significant adverse event that has a potential to impair patient compliance with subsequent vaccines. Identification and avoidance of potential allergens through standardized skin tests and diagnostic immunological work-up will contribute to vaccine compliance and better management of hypersensitivity reactions.