IQP-0528

A lubricating microbicide gel designed for rectal and vaginal use would provide a behaviorally congruent strategy to enhance pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence and reduce HIV infection risk. In this study, we report the first-in-human evaluation of such a gel containing 1% IQP-0528, an investigational antiretroviral. Seven HIV-1-negative participants received one 10 mL rectal dose of radiolabeled 1% IQP-0528 gel. We assessed safety; IQP-0528 pharmacokinetics in plasma, and rectal and vaginal tissue; ex vivo local pharmacodynamics (PD); and colorectal distribution. The 1% gel was determined to be safe with one mild event attributed to study product and no effects on rectal tissue histology. All concentrations measured in plasma and vaginal tissue were below the limit of quantitation. Median IQP-0528 concentrations in rectal tissue exceeded the in vitro EC₉₅ against HIV-1 (0.07 ng/mg) by 3-5 h of dosing and remained above this concentration for at least 24 h, despite a 3-log reduction in concentration over this duration of time. Rectal tissue PD-assessed by ex vivo HIV challenge-demonstrated significant p24 antigen reduction 3-5 h postdose compared with baseline (p = .05), but not 24-26 h postdose (p = .75). Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging revealed that product distribution was localized to the rectosigmoid. The IQP-0528 gel possesses desirable features for a topical microbicide including: local safety with no systemic absorption, delivery of locally high IQP-0528 concentrations, and significant reductions in ex vivo HIV infectivity. However, the gel is limited by its rapid clearance and inability to penetrate vaginal tissues following rectal dosing. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03082690.

This study evaluated effects of differing gel volumes on pharmacokinetics (PK). IQB4012, a gel containing the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor IQP-0528 and tenofovir (TFV), was applied to the pigtailed macaque vagina and rectum. Vaginal gel volumes (1% loading of both drugs) were 0.5 or 1.5 ml; following wash-out, 1 or 4 ml of gel were then applied rectally. Blood, vaginal, and rectal fluids were collected at 0, 2, 4, and 24 h. Vaginal and rectal tissue biopsies were collected at 4 and 24 h. There were no statistically significant differences in concentrations for either drug between gel volumes within compartments at matched time points. After vaginal gel application, median IQP-0528 concentrations were ~ 10⁴-10⁵ ng/g, 10⁵-10⁶ ng/ml, and 10³-10⁵ ng/ml in vaginal tissues, vaginal fluids, and rectal fluids, respectively (over 24 h). Median vaginal TFV concentrations were 1-2 logs lower than IQP-0528 levels at matched time points. After rectal gel application, median IQP-0528 and TFV concentrations in rectal fluids were ~ 10³-10⁵ ng/ml and ~ 10²-10³ ng/ml, respectively. Concentrations of both drugs sampled in rectal tissues were low (~ 10¹-10³ ng/g). For 1 ml gel, half of sampled rectal tissues had undetectable concentrations of either drug, and over half of sampled rectal fluids had undetectable TFV concentrations. These results indicate differences in drug delivery between the vaginal and rectal compartments, and that smaller vaginal gel volumes may not significantly compromise microbicide PK and prophylactic potential. However, effects of rectal gel volume on PK for both drugs were less definitive.