Opipramol Hydrochloride

Antidepressants are commonly prescribed for mood disorders. Epidemiological studies suggest antidepressant use may be associated with cataracts and glaucoma. We aim to investigate the association between antidepressants and cataracts and glaucoma.

Data was collected from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian information components (IC025) were calculated for antidepressants (ie, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], serotonin-norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, serotonin modulators and stimulators, serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors [SARIs], norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs], tetracyclic antidepressants [TeCAs], and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs]). The reference agent was acetaminophen.

TeCAs and MAOIs were significantly associated with a decreased risk of cataracts (ROR = 0.11-0.65 and 0.16-0.69, respectively). TCAs, brexanolone, esketamine, and opipramol reported an increased cataract risk (ROR = 1.31-12.81). For glaucoma, SSRIs, SNRIs, SARIs, TCAs, MAOIs, and other investigated antidepressants reported significant RORs ranging from 1.034 to 21.17. There was a nonsignificant association of angle closure glaucoma (ACG) and open angle glaucoma (OAG) with the investigated antidepressants.

For adverse event cases, multiple suspected product names are listed, and as cases are not routinely verified, there may be a possibility of duplicate reports and causality cannot be established.

Most of the investigated antidepressants were associated with a lower risk of cataract reporting. TCAs, brexanolone, esketamine, and opipramol were associated with greater odds of cataract. For most antidepressants, there was an insignificant increase in reports of ACG and OAG.

Exogenous substances, including drugs and chemicals, can transfer into human seminal fluid and influence male fertility and reproduction. In addition, substances relevant in the context of sports drug testing programs, can be transferred into the urine of a female athlete (after unprotected sexual intercourse) and trigger a so-called adverse analytical finding. Here, the question arises as to whether it is possible to distinguish analytically between intentional doping offenses and unintentional contamination of urine by seminal fluid. To this end, 480 seminal fluids from nonathletes were analyzed to identify concentration ranges and metabolite profiles of therapeutic drugs that are also classified as doping agents. Therefore, a screening procedure was developed using liquid chromatography connected to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and suspect samples (i.e., samples indicating the presence of relevant compounds) were further subjected to liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass (tandem) mass spectrometry. The screening method yielded 90 findings (including aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, diuretics, stimulants, glucocorticoids, beta-blockers, antidepressants, and the nonapproved proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist GW1516) in a total of 81 samples, with 91% of these suspected cases being verified by the confirmation method. In addition to the intact drug, phase-I and -II metabolites were also occasionally observed in the seminal fluid. This study demonstrated that various drugs including those categorized as doping agents partition into seminal fluid. Monitoring substances and metabolites may contribute to a better understanding of the distribution and metabolism of exogenous substances in seminal fluid that may be responsible for the impairment of male fertility. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that doping agents as well as clinically relevant substances are transferred/eliminated into seminal fluid to a substantial extent and that knowledge about drug levels (and potential consequences for the male fertility and female exposure) is limited. The herein generated new dataset provides new insights into an important and yet little explored area of drug deposition and elimination, and hereby a basis for the assessment of contamination cases by seminal fluid in sports drug testing.