Recombinant human interleukin-2(Changchun Changsheng Gene Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.)

Multiple studies highlight the role of effector and regulatory CD4⁺T cells in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease, and foster low-dose IL-2 treatment which induces regulatory CD4⁺T (Treg) cells expansion and activation as a promising strategy for its treatment. However, studies demonstrating discrepant Treg functions in AD have been reported. In addition, a compromised immune system associated with aging may substantially impact on these processes. Here, we report that there is an altered balance of activity between Treg cells and IL-17-producing helper T (Th17) cells in periphery and brain of APP/PS1 mice along the disease progression. A dramatic loss of the healthy balance of activity between Treg and Th17 cells was found at the middle disease stage. While peripheral low-dose recombinant human IL-2 administration could selectively modulate the abundance of Treg cells and repair the imbalance between Treg and Th17 subsets at the middle disease stage. We further show that modulation of peripheral immune balance through low-dose IL-2 treatment reduces the neuro-inflammation and increases numbers of plaque-associated microglia, accompanied by marked reduction of Aβ plaque deposition and slower cognitive declines in APP/PS1 mice at the middle disease stage. Our study highlights the therapeutic potential of repurposed IL-2 for innovative immunotherapy based on modulation of the homeostasis of CD4⁺T cell subsets in Alzheimer's disease at the middle disease stage.

Approximately 5%–10% of the general population respond inadequately to licensed recombinant hepatitis B vaccines. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a new HBAI20 vaccine, consisting of a new AI20 adjuvant (20‐µg recombinant human IL‐2 attached to 20‐µg aluminium hydroxide) in combination with HBVaxPro®‐10 µg.

In a double‐blinded, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial, 18‐ to 59‐year‐old healthy non‐responders (titre <10 mIU/ml after three or more doses of hepatitis B vaccine) were assigned (3:1 ratio) to receive either HBAI20 vaccine or HBVaxPro®‐10 µg in a 0, 1 and 2‐month schedule. The primary outcome was seroprotection (titre ≥ 10 mIU/ml) measured 1‐3 months following the third vaccination.

A total of 133 participants were randomised to receive either HBAI20 vaccine (n = 101) or HBVaxPro®‐10 µg (n = 32). In the modified intention‐to‐treat analysis, the seroprotection rate after the third vaccination was 92.0% (80/87) in the HBAI20 group and 79.3% (23/29) in the HBVaxPro®‐10‐µg group, P = .068. Using a generalised linear mixed model to adjust for stratification factors, a higher odds of seroprotection with HBAI20 vaccine was shown (adjusted odds ratio = 3.48, P = .028). Frequency of mild and moderate local adverse events was greater in the HBAI20 group than in the HBVaxPro®‐10 µg. Rates of severe local adverse events and systemic adverse events were low and similar in both groups.

In this group of hepatitis B vaccine non‐responders, the HBAI20 vaccine demonstrated a higher seroprotection rate when adjusting for stratification factors and a similar safety profile compared to the licensed recombinant HBVaxPro®‐10 µg.