Unspecified blepharoconjunctivitis

Surgery, anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, hormonal medicines, and targeted treatments), and/or radiation are common treatment strategies for neoplastic diseases. Anticancer drugs eliminate malignant cells through the inhibition of specific pathways that contribute to the formation and development of cancer. Given the ability of such pharmacological medications to combat cancerous cells, their role in the management of neoplastic diseases has become essential. However, these drugs may also lead to undesirable systemic and ocular adverse effects due to cyto/neuro-toxicity and inflammatory reactions. Ocular surface side effects are recognized to significantly impact patient's quality of life and quality of vision. Blepharoconjunctivitis is known to be a common side effect caused by oxaliplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and docetaxel, while anastrozole, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil can all determine dry eye disease. However, the potential processes involved in the development of these alterations are yet not fully understood, especially for novel drugs currently available for cancer treatment. This review aims at analyzing the potential ocular surface and adnexal side effects of novel anticancer medications, trying to provide a better understanding of the underlying pharmacological processes and useful insights on the choice of proper management.

Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is rare and has significant morbimortality rates. Approximately 85% of newborns are infected intrapartum, and risk factors for mother-to-child transmission include vaginal delivery, primary maternal infection, and prolonged rupture of membranes. Neonatal HSV can manifest with isolated mucocutaneous lesions, neurological involvement, or disseminated disease. In general, herpetic infection can cause blepharoconjunctivitis or keratitis. We report a rare case of congenital herpes with ophthalmologic manifestations and multisystemic involvement.

A preterm infant, born at 32 weeks and 2 days, with presumed neonatal infection developed intestinal and respiratory complications, as well as hyperemic lesions on the left nostril and oral mucosa. An ophthalmological assessment was requested and brought up the suspicion of HSV infection, indicating empirical treatment with endovenous acyclovir. Later, a new ocular examination was suggestive of panuveitis. Afterward, serum IgM antibodies to HSV-1 and HSV-2 were positive. Proper antiviral therapy led to an improvement in the condition.

Neonatal herpes is associated with a high risk of persistent skin lesions, long-term neurological disability and other lasting sequelae. It is essential to consider HSV infection in cases of neonatal conjunctivitis, especially in patients with an epithelial defect and no improvement after initial treatment with topical or systemic antibiotics.

In the management of neonatal HSV, early diagnosis is essential for the timely initiation of antiviral therapy. Our report highlights that ocular assessment can be crucial in the correct diagnostic investigation of this condition.

To describe the clinical and morphologic changes in the ocular surface microstructure of patients affected with moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) before and during Dupilumab treatment.

This is a monocentric observational study on thirty-three patients affected with AD before and during Dupilumab treatment. All patients underwent a slit-lamp examination: complete clinical assessment, Break Up Time test (BUT), Schirmer test, and corneal staining grading (Oxford scale) were performed. Meibomian Glands Dysfunction (MGD) evaluation (Meibography), Non-invasive Keratograph Break Up Time test (NIKBUT), Tear Meniscus Height (TMH), and ocular Redness Score (RS) have been investigated using an OCULUS Keratograph. In vivo images of the conjunctiva, cornea, and meibomian glands have been acquired by confocal microscopy.

Sixty-six eyes were included in our study: twenty-two eyes of 11 naive patients with indication for treatment but not in therapy yet (Group 1) and forty-four eyes of 22 patients treated with Dupilumab for at least 4 months (subcutaneous administration of 300 mg every 2 weeks) (Group 2). Either patients treated with Dupilumab or naive patients with moderate-to-severe forms of AD had a tear film instability (TBUT and NIKBUT reduced), whereas the quantity of the tear film was overall normal (Schirmer test and TMH), without statistically significant differences between the two groups. When Meibography was performed with the Keratograph, the difference between Group 1 and Group 2 was statistically significant in terms of Meiboscore (p = 0.0043 and p = 0.0242, respectively), as well as the difference in terms of mean RS. These results paired well with the confocal microscopy results in which we found a decrease in the goblet cell population in the conjunctival epithelium in the treated group (5.2 cells/mm), along with inflammatory cells that were more concentrated around the adenoid lumina of the meibomian glands.

In recent years, the use of Dupilumab has been increasing, but mild-to-severe conjunctivitis is a common side effect. Our major results demonstrate a loss of meibomian glands at the Keratograph examination: we can assume a reduced meibum secretion and an evaporative dry eye with MGD. We suggest that the inflammation of the ocular surface may involve not only the cornea and the conjunctiva, but also the meibomian glands, and Dupilumab may play a role. However, the frequency of clear conjunctivitis is not as common as reported in the literature.