PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S):Liver metastases (LM) are common in advanced thoracic cancer patients with dismal oncological outcomes. Even in the modern era of novel systemic therapy, LM led to a 21% increased mortality risk compared with those without. Options for progressive multiple LM after systemic therapy are limited. Therefore, a different treatment modality is urgently needed to overcome such a predicament. Herein, we renovate the classical whole liver radiotherapy (WLRT) and evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating thoracic cancer patients with progressive multiple LM.
MATERIALS/METHODS:Patients with lung or thymic cancer who had multiple LM treated by WLRT between 2018 and 2022 were enrolled. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered with a median dose of 24 Gy (range 8-25 Gy) in 8 fractions (range 1-16) at the discretion of treating physicians. Overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of intrahepatic progression were calculated from the completion of WLRT till death or progression by Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analyses, respectively.
RESULTS:Twenty-four patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Eleven patients (46%) had lung adenocarcinoma, of which nine patients had oncogenic mutations. Six patients (25%) had small cell lung cancer (SCLC), four patients (17%) had thymic squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), two patients (8%) had lung SqCC, and one patient (4%) had mixed histology. Eighteen patients (75%) were under systemic therapy treatment before the diagnosis of LM, and fifteen (63%) received LM biopsy. The median time from the diagnosis of LM to WLRT was 7.5 months (range, 0.5-33.9 months). Eleven patients (46%) had concurrent RT and systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 3.1 months, the 3-, 6- and 12-month OS were 57%, 38%, and 15%, respectively. After adjusting death as a competing risk, the cumulative incidence of LM progression at 3, 6, and 12 months were 10%, 19%, and 44%, respectively. Within three months after the completion of RT, one patient (4%) had grade 5 radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), one patient (4%) had grade 4 abnormal liver function test (LFT), three patients (13%) had grade 3 abnormal LFT, and twelve patients (50%) had ≤ grade 2 abnormal LFT. The patient who had Gr.5 RILD expired 51 days after the completion of RT with 24 Gy in 8 fractions concurrently with topotecan. He had primary SCLC with viral hepatitis B. His LFT was around the normal upper limit before WLRT.
CONCLUSION:WLRT provided favorable intrahepatic control with acceptable radiation-related toxicities and could be considered a treatment option for patients with progressive LM under systemic therapy. Further investigation with a larger cohort is warranted to identify patients at a high risk of developing severe RILD.