Onametostat

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) play critical roles in Plasmodium falciparum , a protozoan causing the deadliest form of malaria, making them potential targets for novel antimalarial drugs. Here, we screened 11 novel PRMT inhibitors against P. falciparum asexual growth and found that onametostat, an inhibitor for type II PRMTs, exhibited strong antimalarial activity with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) value of 1.69 ± 0.04 µM. In vitro methyltransferase activities of purified PfPRMT5 were inhibited by onametostat, and a shift of IC 50 to onametostat was found in the PfPRTM5 disruptant parasite line, indicating that PfPRTM5 is the primary target of onametostat. Consistent with the function of PfPRMT5 in mediating symmetric dimethylation of histone H3R2 (H3R2me2s) and in regulating invasion-related genes, onametostat treatment led to the reduction of H3R2me2s level in P. falciparum and caused the defects on the parasite’s invasion of red blood cells. This study provides a starting point for identifying specific PRMT inhibitors with the potential to serve as novel antimalarial drugs.

Both lysine and arginine methyltransferases are thought to be promising therapeutic targets for malignant tumors, yet how these methyltransferases function in malignant tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has not been fully elucidated. Here, we reported that SMYD4, a lysine methyltransferase, acts as an oncogene in HCC. SMYD4 was highly upregulated in HCC and promoted HCC cell proliferation and metastasis. Mechanistically, PRMT5, a well‐known arginine methyltransferase, was identified as a SMYD4‐binding protein. SMYD4 monomethylated PRMT5 and enhanced the interaction between PRMT5 and MEP50, thereby promoting the symmetrical dimethylation of H3R2 and H4R3 on the PRMT5 target gene promoter and subsequently activating DVL3 expression and inhibiting expression of E‐cadherin, RBL2, and miR‐29b‐1‐5p. Moreover, miR‐29b‐1‐5p was found to inversely regulate SMYD4 expression in HCC cells, thus forming a positive feedback loop. Furthermore, we found that the oncogenic effect of SMYD4 could be effectively suppressed by PRMT5 inhibitor in vitro and in vivo. Clinically, high coexpression of SMYD4 and PRMT5 was associated with poor prognosis of HCC patients. In summary, our study provides a model of crosstalk between lysine and arginine methyltransferases in HCC and highlights the SMYD4‐PRMT5 axis as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of HCC.