Esmirtazapine maleate

Drug-drug interactions (DDI) and genomic variation (PG) can lead to dangerously high blood and tissue concentrations with some drugs but may be negligible with other drugs. Using a quantitative metaanalysis, we analyzed on the example of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 substrates, how well the effects of DDI and PG can be predicted by in vitro methods. In addition, we analyzed the quantitative effect of prototypic inhibitors of the two enzymes in relation to their genetic deficiency. More than 600 published studies were screened which compared either human pharmacokinetics with and without comedication, or which compared human pharmacokinetics of deficient with extensive metabolizers, or which assessed metabolism by in vitro approaches. With human liver microsomes, the in vitro to in vivo agreement of fractional clearances was reasonably high if loss of substrate was quantified in the in vitro assays performed with and without enzyme specific inhibitors. Also a generally very high correlation between the clinical pharmacokinetic effects of inherited deficiency and inhibition by drug-drug interactions could be demonstrated. Most cases of poor correlation were explained by the lack of CYP2D6 versus CYP2C19 specificity of fluoxetine or by a poor knowledge of the quantitative contribution of the metabolic pathways if metabolite formation was quantified in the in vitro assays. The good correspondence of the in vitro data with clinical DDI and clinical PG studies may be a good basis for future application of these methods in drug development and drug therapy.

Esmirtazapine (1.5-4.5 mg) has demonstrated short-term sleep-promoting effects in nonelderly outpatients with chronic insomnia. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00631657) and its open-label extension (NCT00750919) investigated efficacy and safety of long-term esmirtazapine treatment in adult outpatients with chronic insomnia.

Participants were randomized to receive esmirtazapine 4.5 mg or placebo for 6 months; those receiving esmirtazapine were then rerandomized to esmirtazapine or placebo for an additional 7 days. Participants could enter the 6-month open-label extension with esmirtazapine 4.5 mg. The primary objective of the double-blind study was to assess long-term efficacy of esmirtazapine vs placebo on self-reported total sleep time. Assessing long-term safety and tolerability were secondary and primary objectives of the double-blind and extension studies, respectively.

Overall, 457 participants received treatment in the double-blind study (esmirtazapine, n = 342; placebo, n = 115) and 184 participants (prior esmirtazapine, n = 136; prior placebo, n = 48) received esmirtazapine in the extension. In the double-blind study, a 48.7-minute increase in average nightly total sleep time was observed for esmirtazapine vs placebo (95% confidence interval, 35.0-62.5; P < .0001) at months 4-6. There was no evidence of residual effects on next-day alertness or daytime functioning and no evidence of rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms upon treatment discontinuation. Esmirtazapine was generally well tolerated; somnolence and weight gain were the most common adverse events.

Esmirtazapine improved sleep duration vs placebo over at least 6 months. There was no evidence of next-day residual effects or of withdrawal symptoms or rebound insomnia following abrupt treatment discontinuation.

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A 6-Month Efficacy and Safety Study of Org 50081 in Adult Patients With Chronic Primary Insomnia (21106/P05701/MK-8265-002); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00631657; Identifier: NCT00631657; and Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Twenty-Six Week Extension Trial of Org 50081 (Esmirtazapine) in Outpatients With Chronic Primary Insomnia (176003/P05721/MK-8265-007); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00750919); Identifier: NCT00750919.