Pexelizumab

Inflammation is emerging as an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and has been a recent target for many novel therapeutic agents. However, comparative evidence regarding efficacy of these anti-inflammatory treatment options is currently lacking.

This systematic review will include randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of anti-inflammatory agents on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with known cardiovascular disease. Studies will be retrieved from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as clinical trial registry websites, Europe PMC and conference abstract handsearching. No publication date or language restrictions will be imposed. Eligible interventions must have some component of anti-inflammatory agent. These include (but are not limited to): non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, prednisone, methotrexate, canakinumab, pexelizumab, anakinra, succinobucol, losmapimod, inclacumab, atreleuton, LP-PLA2(darapladib) and sPLA2(varespladib). The primary outcomes will include major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and each individual component of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death). Key secondary outcomes will include unstable angina, heart failure, all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest and revascularisation. Screening, inclusion, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by two reviewers. Network meta-analysis based on the random effects model will be conducted to compare treatment effects both directly and indirectly. The quality of the evidence will be assessed with appropriate tools including the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation profiler or Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.

Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42022303289.

Despite significant advances in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there remains a significant short-term and long-term increased mortality risk. Risk stratification to target those who may benefit from more intensive therapy postrevascularisation therefore remains an important goal. Risk stratification models in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been researched for many years, but few risk scores have been developed and validated specifically for the STEMI population. Only 27% of the cohort for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was derived from those undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI), and the GRACE score performs less accurately in those undergoing PCI compared with medical therapy. Nevertheless European1 (but not American2) guidelines recommend its use for clinical risk stratification in the STEMI cohort. Risk scores derived specifically for STEMI include the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue plasminogen activator to treat Occluded arteries (GUSTO) risk score, which was developed in the era of thrombolysis, while risk scores assessing mortality in primary PCI patients include the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) risk score, Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) risk score, Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) score, Soroka Acute Myocardial Infarction (SAMI) score, and the Zwolle risk score. Coelho-Lima and colleagues3 examine the prognostic value of troponin specifically in the STEMI population, a group where troponin is not used to guide initial treatment. Their major findings are that admission troponin, but not troponin measured 12 hours post-reperfusion, was a significant independent predictor of both inpatient or overall mortality, with a median follow-up time of over 4 years. The authors are to be commended for this large retrospective study—in particular, the clinical …