BAY-867548

Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer (PC) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is gaining in popularity as it is noninvasive and associated with fewer side effects than standard whole-gland treatments. However, better methods to evaluate response to HIFU ablation are an unmet need. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in PC. In this study, we evaluated a novel approach of using both ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/MRI in each patient before and after HIFU to assess the accuracy of target tumor localization and response to treatment. Methods: Fourteen men, 64.5 ± 8.0 y old (range, 48-78 y), with newly diagnosed PC were prospectively enrolled. Before HIFU, the patients underwent prostate biopsy, multiparametric MRI, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11, and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI. Response to treatment was assessed at a minimum of 6 mo after HIFU with prostate biopsy (n = 13), as well as ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI (n = 14). The SUV_max and SUV_peak of known or suspected PC lesions were collected. Results: Pre-HIFU biopsy revealed 18 cancers, of which 14 were clinically significant (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4). Multiparametric MRI identified 18 lesions; 14 of them were at least score 4 in the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI each showed 23 positive intraprostatic lesions; 21 were congruent in 13 patients, and 5 were incongruent in 5 patients. Before HIFU, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 identified all target tumors, whereas ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI missed 2 tumors. After HIFU, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/MRI both identified clinically significant residual disease in 1 patient. Three significant ipsilateral recurrent lesions were identified, whereas 1 was missed by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11. The pretreatment level of prostate-specific antigen decreased significantly after HIFU, by 66%. Concordantly, the pretreatment SUV_max decreased significantly after HIFU for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (P = 0.001) and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (P = 0.005). Conclusion: This pilot study showed that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI identified the target tumor for HIFU in 100% and 86% of cases, respectively, and accurately verified response to treatment. PET may be a useful tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment success in patients receiving focal therapy for PC. These preliminary findings warrant larger studies for validation.

Considering the wide range of therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer (e.g., active surveillance, radiation-beam therapy, focal therapy, and radical prostatectomy), accurate assessment of the aggressiveness and localization of primary prostate cancer lesions is essential for treatment decision making. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recognize prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for use in initial staging of high-risk primary prostate cancer. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) is a neuropeptide receptor overexpressed by low-risk prostate cancer cells. We aimed to perform the first (to our knowledge) prospective head-to-head comparison of PSMA- and GRP-R-targeted imaging at initial staging to understand how PSMA PET and GRP-R PET can be used or combined in clinical practice. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, diagnostic cross-sectional imaging study using anonymized, masked, and independent interpretations of paired PET/CT studies in 22 patients with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 (a radiolabeled PSMA inhibitor) and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2, a radiolabeled GRP-R antagonist). We enrolled patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven prostate cancer. None had received neoadjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy, and all underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Histologic findings served as a reference. Results: On a lesion-based analysis (including lesions < 0.1 cm³), ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT detected 74.3% (26/35) of all tumor lesions and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/CT detected 78.1% (25/32; 1 patient could not be offered ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/CT). Paired examinations showed positive uptake of the 2 tracers in 21 of 32 lesions (65.6%), negative uptake in 5 of 32 lesions (15.6%), and discordant uptake in 6 of 32 lesions (18.8%). Uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 was higher when the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score was at least 4 versus at least 1 (P < 0.0001) or 2 (P = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in uptake between ISUP scores for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2. Median ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 SUV_max was significantly higher than median ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 SUV_max in the ISUP-2 subgroup (P = 0.01). Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT is useful to depict higher, more clinically significant ISUP score lesions, and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/CT has a higher detection rate for low-ISUP tumors. Combining PSMA PET and GRP-R PET allows for better classification of intraprostatic lesions.