Grazoprevir Hydrate

One of the limitations with an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation strategy is low drug loading. Hydrophobic drugs have poor wettability and require a substantial amount of polymer to stabilize the amorphous drug and facilitate release. Using grazoprevir and hypromellose acetate succinate as model drug and polymer, respectively, the interplay between particle surface composition, particle wettability, and release performance was investigated. A hierarchical particle approach was used where the surfaces of high drug loading ASDs generated by either solvent evaporation or co-precipitation were further modified with a secondary excipient (i.e., polymer or wetting agent). The surface-modified particles were characterized for drug release, wettability, morphology, and surface composition using two-stage dissolution studies, contact angle measurements, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. Despite surface modification with hydrophilic polymers, the hierarchical particles did not consistently exhibit good release performance. Contact angle measurements showed that the secondary excipient had a profound impact on particle wettability. Particles with good wettability showed improved drug release relative to particles that did not wet well, even with similar drug loadings. These observations underscore the intricate interplay between particle wettability and performance in amorphous dispersion formulations and illustrate a promising hierarchical particle approach to formulate high drug loading amorphous dispersions with improved dissolution performance.

A sensitive and accurate LC/MS method for the determination of elbasvir (ELB) and grazoprevir (GZP) in human plasma was established using daclatasvir (DCT) as an internal standard. The analytes were separated on a Waters Spherisorb phenyl column (150mm×4.6mm ID, 5μm particle size) maintained at 40°C±2°C. Gradient elution, at a flow rate of 0.8mLmin^-1, was used. The mobile phase consists of 90% of acetonitrile mixed to 10% of a 5mM ammonium formate buffer (+0.1% v/v of trimethylamine, pH was adjusted to 3.2 by formic acid) as phase A and 10% of acetonitrile mixed to 90% of the same buffer as phase B. Liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate solvent was used to recuperate compounds from plasma. The method was validated over a concentration range of 2 and 100ng/mL for GZP and between 1 and 50ng/mL for ELB. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy of the quality control samples at low, medium, and high concentration levels exhibited relative standard deviations (RSD)<15%, and the accuracy values ranged from 94.2 to 107.8%. The robustness of the method was established using a two-level full factorial design.