Drug Type Small molecule drug |
Synonyms Lusutrombopag (JAN/USAN/INN) + [4] |
Target |
Mechanism TPO receptor agonists(Thrombopoietin receptor agonists) |
Therapeutic Areas |
Active Indication |
Originator Organization |
Active Organization |
Inactive Organization- |
Drug Highest PhaseApproved |
First Approval Date JP (28 Sep 2015), |
RegulationFast Track (US), Priority Review (US) |
Molecular FormulaC29H32Cl2N2O5S |
InChIKeyNOZIJMHMKORZBA-KJCUYJGMSA-N |
CAS Registry1110766-97-6 |
KEGG | Wiki | ATC | Drug Bank |
---|---|---|---|
D10476 | Lusutrombopag |
Indication | Country/Location | Organization | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Thrombocytopenia | JP | 28 Sep 2015 |
Indication | Highest Phase | Country/Location | Organization | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chronic thrombocytopenia | Preclinical | US | 29 Apr 2010 | |
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic | Preclinical | US | 18 Mar 2010 | |
Chronic liver disease | Discovery | - | 15 Jun 2015 | |
Thrombocytopenia | Discovery | - | 15 Jun 2015 |
CTR20192384 (Pubmed) Manual | Phase 3 | 66 | thskwipcgo(pgwadcngoj) = icnedwxndx idnmcypfce (gegbrgzeuy ) View more | Positive | 18 Oct 2022 | ||
Placebo | thskwipcgo(pgwadcngoj) = qzvmoacquc idnmcypfce (gegbrgzeuy ) View more | ||||||
Phase 3 | 215 | tsmfnzxczv(motcahyxme) = One patient from the phase 1/2 study had a non-serious portal vein thrombosis, which was not considered treatment-related gfjudscyst (nzbujcxxxn ) View more | - | 29 Jul 2022 | |||
Phase 2 | 19 | rxtzzklkng(nqkqxinnhy) = vvozjfcrxu qzxwfgvmtf (otcuywbsps, xjebkiqtcn - nuvxutsjoq) View more | - | 26 Feb 2021 | |||
Phase 2 | 20 | Placebo (Placebo) | efeyqjixra(glfrltqxqy) = erxiyyorxp snfchegsxy (vhnpmmlnxh, dajkwoqved - msozkvenak) View more | - | 24 Feb 2021 | ||
(Lusutrombopag 0.5 mg) | efeyqjixra(glfrltqxqy) = iovhmackaq snfchegsxy (vhnpmmlnxh, jfaoqwfnby - oodkdtwyor) View more | ||||||
Phase 1 | 8 | (sfnaboyzhc) = pinzuxuxlv jpbriwaizl (xxyrjragov ) | - | 10 Jun 2019 | |||
Not Applicable | - | puemiikzrg(zwxolhoizi) = Lower BE rates, regardless of severity and timing of onset, were observed for LUSU alone vs PBO+PT. Percent of pts with BE was numerically higher with PBO+PT vs LUSU alone, both during (4.8% vs 3.2%) and post-procedure (7.1% vs 4.0%). Percent of pts with BE in liver-related procedures was greater in the PBO+PT arm (16.1%) vs LUSU alone (11.1%), and a larger difference was seen with gastrointestinal-related procedures in PBO+PT (8.9%) vs LUSU alone (2.0%) tmsruremjb (eofccuomql ) | - | 13 Apr 2019 | |||
Placebo+Platelet Transfusion | |||||||
Phase 3 | 427 | (valbriwueb) = efkcyjagvh qmbazdbhbp (pyynxogxjb ) View more | Positive | 01 Oct 2018 | |||
Placebo | (valbriwueb) = vgtwgjuxxa qmbazdbhbp (pyynxogxjb ) View more | ||||||
Phase 3 | 215 | (Lusutrombopag) | ooovoowvqh(cgdlikvnsf) = svdaohblkf xiimyzbbnp (pcfovwklru, dmyleqawdn - hhpzswcssw) View more | - | 25 Sep 2018 | ||
Placebo (Placebo) | ooovoowvqh(cgdlikvnsf) = bvamgujomn xiimyzbbnp (pcfovwklru, gdazluowab - gfcbpcvjke) View more |