Article
Author: Sehested, Thomas S.G. ; Otterstad, Jan Erik ; Schirmer, Henrik ; Stæhr, Peter Bisgaard ; Jensen, Svend E. ; Jortveit, Jarle ; Andresen, Kristoffer ; Vethe, Nils Tore ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian ; Atar, Dan ; Ruddox, Vidar ; Davidsen, Cedric ; Veien, Karsten ; Christiansen, Morten Krogh ; Poenaru, Monica ; Bøtker, Hans Erik ; Larsen, Mogens Lytken ; Lambrechtsen, Jess ; Pettersen, Alf-Åge Reistad ; Bertelsen, Mette Lykke Norgaard ; Abdulla, Jawdat Abdul Majid ; Dammen, Toril ; Schierbeck, Louise ; Larsen, Alf Inge ; Halvorsen, Sigrun ; Krarup, Nikolaj Thure ; Kjærgaard, Camilla Lyngby ; Gustafsson, Ida ; Tuseth, Vegard ; Deeg, Peter Stefan ; Nymo, Ståle Haugset ; Fagerland, Morten W. ; Gislason, Gunnar ; Vikenes, Kjell ; Egholm, Gro ; Bendz, Bjørn ; Olsen, Michael Hecht ; Kristensen, Kjeld ; Steigen, Terje ; Edvardsen, Thor ; Bøhmer, Ellen ; Borg, Eva Bostad ; Thomsen, Kristian Korsgaard ; Mæng, Michael ; Mikkelsen, Dennis ; Bakken, Arnhild ; Brattrud, Anja Otrebska ; Munkhaugen, John ; Böttcher, Morten ; Kristensen, Anna Meta D. ; Jadou, Ghassan ; Prescott, Eva ; Brønnum-Schou, Jens ; Wiseth, Rune ; Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe ; Engstrøm, Thomas ; Bovin, Ann ; Bang, Lia Evi ; Holmager, Therese ; Lange, Theis ; Mouridsen, Mette Rauhe ; Snoer, Martin ; Hove, Jens Dahlgaard ; Øie, Erik
BACKGROUND:The evidence supporting beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction was established before the introduction of modern coronary reperfusion therapy and secondary prevention strategies.
METHODS:In an open-label, randomized trial with blinded end-point evaluation, conducted in Denmark and Norway, we assigned patients who had had a myocardial infarction and who had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40%, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive long-term beta-blocker therapy within 14 days after the event or no beta-blocker therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or major adverse cardiovascular events (new myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmias).
RESULTS:A total of 5574 patients underwent randomization and were included in the main analyses - 2783 in the beta-blocker group and 2791 in the no-beta-blocker group. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.6), a primary end-point event had occurred in 394 patients (14.2%) in the beta-blocker group and in 454 patients (16.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.98; P = 0.03). Death from any cause occurred in 4.2% of the patients in the beta-blocker group and in 4.4% of those in the no-beta-blocker group; myocardial infarction occurred in 5.0% and 6.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92), unplanned coronary revascularization in 3.9% and 3.9%, ischemic stroke in 1.6% and 1.3%, heart failure in 1.5% and 1.9%, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in 0.5% and 0.6%. No apparent differences in safety outcomes were observed between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with a myocardial infarction and a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40%, beta-blocker therapy led to a lower risk of death or major adverse cardiovascular events than no beta-blocker therapy. (Funded by the Health South-East research program in Norway and others; BETAMI-DANBLOCK ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03646357 and NCT03778554.).