Article
Author: Popa McKiver, Mihaela ; Manier, Salomon ; Delforge, Michel ; Truppel-Hartmann, Anna ; Chen, Yanping ; Nooka, Ajay K. ; Jagannath, Sundar ; Costa, Luciano J. ; Patel, Krina ; Felten, Jasper ; Wu, Fan ; Cavo, Michele ; Pabst, Thomas ; Bahlis, Nizar J. ; Giralt, Sergio ; Iida, Shinsuke ; Abrahamsen, Ingerid Weum ; Vij, Ravi ; Ailawadhi, Sikander ; Arnulf, Bertrand ; Rodríguez-Otero, Paula ; Piasecki, Julia ; Callander, Natalie ; Broijl, Annemiek ; Raje, Noopur ; Solomon, Scott ; Scheid, Christof ; Zhong, Xiaobo ; Baz, Rachid ; Moreau, Philippe ; Cook, Mark ; Chen, Christine ; Berdeja, Jesús ; Benjamin, Reuben ; Dhanda, Devender ; Caia, Andrea ; Eliason, Laurie
AbstractOutcomes are poor in triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.