AHS Cancer Control Alberta

A multi-centre, randomized, non-inferiority trial in patients with irH, randomized to receive either close surveillance with corticosteroid rescue therapy or early high dose corticosteroids.

Most thyroid cancers can be cured with surgery, sometimes with radioactive iodine therapy. However, some patients have cancer that has spread, and some have cancer that comes back after treatment. For those with remaining cancer, lowering TSH levels is recommended. This is because thyroid cancer growth can depend on TSH, so reducing TSH can lower the risk of cancer returning and slow its growth in patients with cancer that can't be surgically removed.
International guidelines recommend keeping TSH levels as low as <0.1 mU/L for patients with advanced thyroid cancer. This advice is based on past studies, but it hasn't been tested in a controlled way. One old study suggested that not lowering TSH enough could lead to more cancer relapses. Another study suggested that lowering TSH more could help prevent cancer from getting worse in high-risk patients. However, a recent study found no link between TSH levels and better outcomes, and the researchers suggested doing a new study to confirm if this practice is truly beneficial.
Lowering TSH levels to <0.1 mU/L using levothyroxine has been the standard of care for treating advanced thyroid cancer for a long time. The researchers would like to investigate whether using levothyroxine to keep TSH levels between 0.1 and 0.5 mU/L is just as safe and effective for cancer treatment as the current recommendation of keeping it below 0.1 mU/L. The researchers also believe this study can help set TSH suppression targets based on cancer type, reducing unnecessary side effects from too much TSH suppression while still achieving the same cancer treatment results.
If the researchers can prove that keeping TSH levels between 0.1 and 0.5 mU/L is just as safe and effective as the standard of care practice, we can change our standard treatment approach. This would help reduce symptoms for our patients.

This clinical trial is comparing morning infusions of the study drug (pembrolizumab) to random infusion scheduling for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Participants will be randomized to either the Intervention (Morning Group) where Infusion start times are restricted between 0800 AM and 1000 AM or to the Control (Standard of Care) group where scheduling will occur as standard of care scheduling, in which infusions are scheduled without respect to a specific time of day.
There are past studies that suggest the timing of treatment may influence immune response and outcomes. This idea is called chronotherapy. Chronotherapy explores the notion that the timing of drug administration in relation to the body's internal clock can optimize treatment effectiveness. The timing of the infusions for the morning group was therefore, chosen based on data from these past studies that looked at circadian variation in immune system function with the intent to focus on similar infusion windows.
The aim of this study is to provide confirmation that the intervention is possible to achieve and use these results to design a larger study. Circadian timing of drug administration, if effective, would represent an intervention that could improve survival outcomes at no additional cost or apparent increase in toxicity, which is truly rare in oncology.
Participants are asked to participate in the study intervention for 18 weeks (6 cycles of pembrolizumab), after which participants would continue with ad hoc scheduling as per standard of care.