Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH

In a clinical study, tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GIP/GLP-1RA), provided superior glycemic control vs the GLP-1RA semaglutide. The physiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood.

This work aimed to evaluate treatment effects by model-based analyses of mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) data.

A 28-week double–blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin was conducted at 2 clinical research centers in Germany. Interventions included tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1 mg, and placebo. Main outcome measures included glycemic control, model-derived β-cell function indices including insulin secretion rate (ISR) at 7.2–mmol/L glucose (ISR7.2), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-CGS), insulin sensitivity, and estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio.

Tirzepatide significantly reduced fasting glucose and MMTT total glucose area under the curve (AUC) vs semaglutide (P < .01). Incremental glucose AUC did not differ significantly between treatments; therefore, greater total glucose AUC reduction with tirzepatide was mainly attributable to greater suppression of fasting glucose. A greater reduction in total ISR AUC was achieved with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01), in the context of greater improvement in insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide (P < .01). ISR7.2 was significantly increased with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .05), showing improved β-CGS. MMTT-derived β-CGS was increased but not significantly different between treatments. Both treatments reduced fasting glucagon and total glucagon AUC, with glucagon AUC significantly reduced with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01). The estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio did not change substantially with either treatment.

These results suggest that the greater glycemic control observed for tirzepatide manifests as improved fasting glucose and glucose excursion control, due to improvements in ISR, insulin sensitivity, and glucagon suppression.

Background: Digital health applications (DiGA) supporting the management of diabetes are among the most commonly available digital health technologies. However, transparent quality assurance of DiGA and clinical proof of a positive healthcare effect is often missing, which creates skepticism of some stakeholders regarding the usage and reimbursement of these applications. Methods: This article reviews the recently established fast-track integration of DiGA in the German reimbursement market, with emphasis on the current impact for manufacturers, healthcare providers, and people with diabetes. The German DiGA fast track is contextualised with corresponding initiatives in Europe. Results: The option of a provisional prescription and reimbursement of DiGA while proving a positive healthcare effect in parallel may expedite the adoption of DiGA in Germany and beyond. However, hurdles for a permanent prescription and reimbursement of DiGA are high and only one of 12 that have achieved this status specifically addresses people with diabetes. Conclusion: The DiGA fast track needs to be further enhanced to cope with remaining skepticism and contribute even more to a value-based diabetes care.

Mim8 (denecimig) is a novel activated coagulation factor VIII-mimetic bispecific antibody that assembles with activated coagulation FIX and FX on the platelet membrane surface.

The FRONTIER1 (NCT04204408, NN7769-4513) single ascending dose and the 4882 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies (NCT05127473, NN7769-4882) examined the safety, tolerability, PK, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Mim8 in healthy adult males.

The FRONTIER1 single ascending dose study consisted of 6 cohorts, each with 6 participants who received a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose of Mim8 and 2 participants who received a placebo. The 4882 PK study had 11 arms, each with 6 participants who received a single s.c. dose of Mim8. The primary endpoint for both studies was treatment-emergent adverse events. Other safety assessments included relative changes in D-dimer, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, fibrinogen, and platelets. The PK and PD were assessed using Mim8 plasma concentration and activated partial thromboplastin clotting time and thrombin generation, respectively.

Mim8 was well tolerated, and there were no severe treatment-emergent adverse events. The PK properties of Mim8 in both studies were consistent with dose-proportionality. The terminal half-life of Mim8 after a single dose was approximately 1 month, and maximum plasma concentration was reached after 10 days.

The PK and PD profiles suggest that Mim8 is suitable as a long-acting FVIIIa-mimetic bispecific antibody for hemophilia A prophylaxis.