Article
Author: Foureau, Aurore ; Deuze, Juliette ; Mahé, Emmanuel ; Beyrouti, Alexandre ; Garnier, Margaux ; Hubiche, Thomas ; Badaoui, Antoine ; Raison-Peyron, Nadia ; Nosbaum, Audrey ; Viguier, Manuelle ; Barbarot, Sébastien ; Seneschal, Julien ; Pasteur, Justine ; Le Moigne, Marie ; Leleu, Camille ; Pralong, Pauline ; Fontas, Eric ; Mallet, Stéphanie ; Regnault, Marie Masson ; Droitcourt, Catherine ; Aubert, Hélène ; Staumont-Sallé, Delphine ; Boukari, Feriel ; Bernier, Claire ; Abasq, Claire ; Passeron, Thierry ; Tetart, Florence ; Jachiet, Marie ; Fougerousse, Anne-Claire ; Toussaint, Clémentine
BACKGROUND:Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) may discontinue dupilumab owing to dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events (DOAEs) or dupilumab-induced facial redness (DFR).
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate DOAE and DFR outcomes after switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi).
METHODS:This retrospective study included 106 patients discontinuing dupilumab because of DOAEs and/or DFR. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with resolution of adverse events or improvement between dupilumab discontinuation (M0) and 3 to 6 months of tralokinumab or JAKi (M3-M6) treatment; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with controlled AD defined by Investigator's Global Assessment scores of 0/1 at M3 to M6.
RESULTS:Proportions of patients with DOAE (92% vs 72%; P = .0244) and DFR (85% vs 33%; P = .0006) resolution or improvement were higher with JAKi than with tralokinumab. Proportions of patients reaching an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1 increased from M0-M3 through M6 (22% vs 42%; P = .0067) in the JAKi group and remained similar (32% vs 35%) in the tralokinumab group. However, 57% discontinued the new treatment after 8 months on average, mainly owing to lack of efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS:Janus kinase inhibitor appears to be more efficient than tralokinumab in managing dupilumab-induced AE; however, both strategies may fail to control AD.