IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo

Pneumonia is a major cause of illness and death in children, with an annual incidence of about 3.3 per 1,000 in those under five years old, many requiring hospitalization. The diagnosis is challenging due to the absence of a universally accepted gold standard, leading to variability in emergency settings. Current guidelines recommend diagnosis based on history and physical examination, which do not reliably differentiate pneumonia from other respiratory infections or identify whether it is bacterial or viral in nature. This uncertainty can lead to the unnecessary use of antibiotics.
Commonly used chest X-rays have limitations such as low sensitivity, moderate interobserver reliability, and the inability to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia. In contrast, lung ultrasound has shown high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing pneumonia in children. However, lung ultrasound also cannot reliably distinguish between bacterial and viral causes and might lead to increased antibiotic prescriptions by detecting minor lung consolidations not seen on chest X-rays. Despite these issues, lung ultrasound is widely used in pediatric pulmonary assessment.
The primary objective of the study is to determine if using lung ultrasound for diagnosing pneumonia in children can reduce antibiotic prescriptions compared to the standard care approach-which mainly relies on clinical diagnosis (often supplemented by chest X-ray and blood tests in selected cases). The secondary objective is to assess how frequently lung ultrasound impacts management decisions during a single clinical visit, beyond the information provided by history and physical examination. The third objective is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound-supported diagnosis with existing diagnostic methods.
The study hypothesizes that lung ultrasound results can act as a decision modifier, similar to other clinical tools and examination findings. However, a lack of consensus on specific lung ultrasound parameters and their clinical correlations contributes to variability in managing suspected pneumonia, potentially leading to antibiotic overuse.
Eligible participants are children aged three to ten years who are in good general condition and clinically stable, presenting with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection indicative of pneumonia. Exclusion criteria include children outside the specified age range, those recently hospitalized, those who have undergone prior chest imaging, those already on antibiotic therapy, those with severe clinical instability, and those with underlying conditions predisposing them to severe or recurrent pneumonia. These criteria help ensure that the study population represents general pediatric community-acquired pneumonia cases, avoiding biases from high-risk patients.
The ultimate goal of this study is to provide evidence on whether lung ultrasound can serve as a reliable tool to guide antibiotic prescriptions, thereby reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the management of pediatric pneumonia.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common childhood chronic rheumatic disease, encompassing all forms of arthritis that persist for more than 6 weeks, with onset before age 16, after exclusion of other causes of arthritis. It is a heterogeneous disease, whose complexity is only partially encompassed by the actual classification criteria and it is characterized by prolonged synovial inflammation that can lead to joint destruction.
Whilst the assessment of structural joint damage is part of the routinary evaluation of disease severity and progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to the extent that it is considered a key end-point outcome in treatment efficacy studies, this is not the same for JIA. Some recommendations have been elaborated based on expert opinion, but only recently they have been translated into clinical practice. Such a discrepancy in approaching chronic arthritis has been for many years due to the lack of articular damage radiographic scoring system validated for pediatric age. Actually, joint space narrowing, bone erosions and demineralization, which is typical of adult articular damage, are not the same changes observed in pediatric population where early growth plate closure, epiphyseal deformity and growth asymmetries can be the major signs.
The transition process from the pediatric to the adult health care team is a critical moment in the clinical history of patients with JIA, often hampered by the absence of specific criteria for the assessment of disease activity, the lack of specific treatment recommendations for JIA adult patients, the poor adolescent-specific training for adult rheumatologists, and the lack of communication between pediatric and adult centers. Adult patients with JIA have their own specific identity and should not be inappropriately re-categorized as having RA, ankylosing spondylitis or another condition once transitioned to the adult rheumatologist.
The aim of this study is to quantify the articular damage of adult patient with JIA after closure of growth plates. This represent a sort of starting burden carried by the patients who receive transition to the adult rheumatologist care and which should be minimized in order to reduce long-term complications. Furthermore, the study aims to analyze possible correlations between the presence of articular damage, therapies taken in pediatric age, and characteristics of JIA at the onset and during the clinical course of the disease

This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, interventional trial followed by a long-term observational extension period in patients with Kawasaki Disease (KD) to be treated eitherwith endovenous Immunoglobulins (IVIG-standard treatment) versus anakinra
Aim of the study: to demonstrate that anakinra is non-inferior to IVIG in KD, in terms of fever control in the acute phase and development of coronary artery dilation/aneurisms (CAA) within one year from the onset.