A baby boy born with a debilitating genetic disease will likely no longer require a liver transplant to stabilize his condition, thanks to a first-of-its-kind genetic medicine he got at 6 months of age.
The experimental treatment, developed by Philadelphia-based startup iECURE, uses an enzyme to cut DNA at a safe location, then has a virus slip in a new copy of a vital gene. It’s
the first time
that regulators have allowed researchers to edit genes directly inside an infant’s body.
“The baby is doing well and growing,” CEO Joseph Truitt told
Endpoints News
in an exclusive interview. The baby was treated about six months ago, and the company plans to present more detailed results at a medical conference in March.
The infant was born without a vital enzyme called ornithine transcarbamylase, or OTC. It’s the same disease that, 25 years ago, was at the center of a patient’s death from an experimental treatment. That tragedy set back the field for years and tarnished the reputation of the researcher leading the effort, gene therapy pioneer Jim Wilson — who is iECURE’s founder.
OTC deficiency affects roughly 100 newborns in the US and 1,000 babies worldwide each year. It leaves patients unable to fully break down protein, causing ammonia to surge in their blood. Left untreated, those protein surges can cause irreversible brain damage. The only cure is a liver transplant, which can take a year to secure.
The goal of the gene therapy was to end all of that. After doctors stabilized the baby boy’s condition with hemodialysis, a strict diet and the ammonia-reducing drug Ravicti, the 6.5-month-old baby got an infusion of iECURE’s gene therapy.
Within three months, blood levels of a protein building block called glutamine were reduced, suggesting the therapy was working. The doctors began weaning him off Ravicti — something that’s normally never done unless the patient gets a liver transplant — and began increasing protein in his diet to normal levels for his age.
“That was the real eye-opening moment,” Truitt said. “Everybody was nervous.”
Now, six months after treatment, his ammonia and glutamine levels are normal and he hasn’t experienced any more metabolic crises. “The response hit the absolute upper level of what we anticipated,” Truitt said. “It checked every box.”
“We’re on the precipice of a new approach in medicine,” Truitt said. “We’re going to insert the gene in a newborn baby, avoid all the downstream sequela that you would have, and potentially cure the patient and let them live a normal life.”
For Wilson, the apparent cure is a remarkable bookend to what was
nearly the end of his career
.
Wilson was attempting to cure OTC deficiency more than 25 years ago at the University of Pennsylvania when Jesse Gelsinger, a patient with the disease, died after a lethal immune reaction to Wilson’s therapy, made from adenoviruses engineered to shuttle a new copy of the OTC gene into his liver.
After Gelsinger’s death, Wilson shifted to working with different DNA delivery vessels called adeno-associated viruses, or AAVs. These viruses are now the workhorses of gene therapy and the basis of several approved products. One company, Ultragenyx, is even using them to treat OTC deficiency in adults.
But treating liver-based diseases in children and infants has been unsuccessful. That’s because AAVs don’t usually integrate into a patient’s genome. The therapeutic gene just sits alongside the chromosomes in a circular strand called an episome. As the liver continues to grow throughout childhood, those episomes get diluted as cells divide, causing the benefits of the therapy to wane over time.
That limitation spurred Wilson to turn to gene editing. He used a pair of molecular scissors to cut DNA in a safe location, allowing the episome to slip in, ensuring that it would be copied and passed on as the patient’s liver grew. iECURE launched in 2021 to develop drugs based on the technique.
Wilson, who
recently left the University of Pennsylvania
to lead a new startup called
GemmaBio
, told Endpoints in an email that he was “highly encouraged” by iECURE’s results, which he said was a 35-year journey since receiving his first NIH grant to work on a cure for the disease. “While there is much more that needs be done before this can be declared a true clinical success, this illustrates the amazing power of modern day science and the importance of persistence,” he said.
Last year, iECURE
got a green light
from regulators to begin trials. The results from its first patient, treated in the UK with the lowest planned dose, went better than expected. The company plans to treat three more infants with the same dose in the first half of this year, including one baby in the US later this month.
“If the next patient or two respond well, we’re going to go back to the regulators and have a discussion about what an accelerated approval pathway would look like,” Truitt said. “I mean, best case scenario, this could be a commercial product in 2027.”
That ambitious timeline could catapult iECURE, a lean operation with 23 employees, ahead of many bigger and better-known gene editing companies. Yet with just one patient treated so far, many questions about the therapy remain.
The biggest unknown is its durability. The company hasn’t proven that the treatment’s benefit is due to gene integration, which is essential for a permanent benefit. Truitt said that based on the company’s preclinical studies in monkeys, he is convinced that the benefits after six months are due to gene integration, not merely episomes. “But the definitive answer to this will be a biopsy,” Truitt said.
Safety is another unknown. A month after infusion, the infant experienced grade 3 transaminitis, a severe elevation of liver enzymes in the blood often seen with gene therapies, but which can be a sign of trouble. Truitt said that the patient got better within a month of taking immunosuppressants and that they will monitor this more closely in the next three patients.
Scientists outside the company are sure to have questions about iECURE’s technical approach too. While most companies in the field are working on CRISPR gene editing, iECURE uses a different editing enzyme called Arcus. The startup’s method requires using two AAVs: one to deliver the Arcus editor and a second to deliver the therapeutic gene. It’s a strategy that hasn’t been employed in humans until now.
Truitt said the company’s $115 million Series A funding will last through the second half of 2025. Raising another $50 million should be enough to get data from the first four patients, but the company will need about $150 million to take its first therapy to commercialization, he added.
Editor’s note: This story was updated with a comment from Jim Wilson.