Anemia, Sickle Cell

iStock, leolintang BioSpace has been compiling a list of the most innovative and exciting biotechs for a decade. Here we take a look back at noteworthy companies from each of those lists. 2024 marked the 10th year of BioSpace ’s NextGen list, a collection of biotechs that are on the cutting edge and poised to break barriers in the industry. As we prep next year’s list, to be released in January, we decided to take a look back at a notable honoree from each of our past lists. There were many fascinating companies that have gone on to great things; on the other hand, sometimes things don’t go as well as we predicted. We have a few not-so-great stories to tell, too. ___________________________________________ 2024 ReNAgade Therapeutics Status: Bought by Orna Therapeutics This company made our list for a pretty big reason: a massive $300 million series A in one of the toughest financing environments in recent memory. The company was launched in May 2023 to develop RNA medicines to treat diseases anywhere in the body. One of the lead investors in the round was MPM BioImpact, whose managing partner Ansbert Gadicke founded ReNAgade. Early in the biotech’s history as a stealth company, there was a bit of foreshadowing as to where the company would end up. ReNAgade struck up a partnership with Orna Therapeutics, which was also working on RNA therapeutics. The work attracted the attention of Merck in a deal worth up to $3.5 billion with development and commercialization milestones. Given the money on the line, Orna went all in on ReNAgade, buying out the biotech in May of this year—almost a year to the day after its launch. Financial details were not disclosed. See the full class of 2024 . ___________________________________________ 2023 Mariana Oncology Status: Bought by Novartis What a year 2023 turned out to be for Mariana Oncology. After raising a $175 million series B in September of that year, the company was bought out by Novartis for $1 billion , plus $750 million in milestones. Originally known as Curie Therapeutics, Mariana emerged from stealth with a $75 series A raise in December 2021 to develop new radiopharmaceuticals. The company caught our eye and made the 2023 list, but apparently Novartis was keeping an eye too. The radiopharmaceutical-hungry Big Pharma said at the time of the deal that Mariana’s technology would help it double down in the field of radioligand therapeutics. On a recent earnings call, Novartis executives expressed their excitement in the Mariana technology, saying that candidates from the buyout are speeding toward the clinic and could go after well-established antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targets. See the full class of 2023 . ___________________________________________ 2022 Eikon Therapeutics Status: Operating Eikon has spent the two years since landing on our list racking up cash and poaching executives from CEO Rodger Perlmutter’s former employer Merck. The biotech’s raises have been huge in a really tough market: a $148 million series A in May 2021, $518 million for a January 2022 series B and most recently, $106 million in series C financing in June 2023 . At the most recent raise, Eikon also announced the acquisition of a clinical pipeline. The company now boasts oncology assets in Phase I and II testing for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, respectively. The rest of Eikon’s pipeline is in preclinical research or discovery. See the full class of 2022 . ___________________________________________ 2021 EQRx Status: Bought by Revolution Medicines, assets terminated EQRx emerged with a lofty goal we could all get behind: develop drugs at a lower cost. It raised a cool $200 million in a July 2020 series A, then caught the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) wave to the Nasdaq just over a year later, adding $1.8 billion in an August 2021 IPO. The company was helmed at first by serial biotech entrepreneur Alexis Borisy. Trouble emerged shortly thereafter, with EQRx cutting lead asset sugemalimab for NSCLC after determining it had no path to market. The company shifted to two other assets, aumolertinib and lerociclib, but later dropped the former. Several rounds of layoffs made the company ever smaller before EQRx finally gave up entirely. The assets were terminated as Revolution Medicines bought out the company and its hefty $1 billion bank account. Borisy has since gone on to start a venture capital firm called Curie.Bio . See the full class of 2021 . ___________________________________________ 2020 Cerevel Therapeutics Status: Bought by AbbVie Cerevel as a company is no more, but its medicines live on at AbbVie, which bought the biotech for $8.7 billion in December 2023. The deal was part of a trend of neuroscience-focused biotechs being bought up by Big Pharma, with Cerevel moving in the same month as Bristol Myers Squibb bought Karuna Therapeutics for $14 billion. BMS was rewarded quickly with a recent FDA approval for KarXT (now Cobenfy) for schizophrenia, but AbbVie too has had success since sealing the deal. Cerevel’s investigational Parkinson’s disease therapy tavapadon improved control of motor symptoms when used with common treatment levodopa in a Phase III trial that read out in April. The data would support a regulatory filing for the therapy, executives said at the time. Two additional late-stage readouts for the therapy are due later this year. But the real star of the deal was emraclidine, which is in Phase III studies for schizophrenia. Cerevel also brought a major depression treatment to the table. “These assets clearly will be great additions to our neuroscience franchise,” said AbbVie’s CEO Rob Michael on the company’s second quarter earnings call. See the full class of 2020 . ___________________________________________ 2019 Genevant Status: Operating One of Roivant’s offshoots, Genevant is still operating today, working on developing nucleic acid delivery technology. Just last week, Genevant signed a deal with CRISPR gene editing company Editas Medicines to develop in vivo gene editing medicines for two undisclosed targets. Genevant has also recently signed deals with Novo Nordisk, Tome Biosciences, Gritstone bio and Repair Biotechnologies. But perhaps the most compelling story from Genevant since we named them to our NextGen list has been their litigation with famed biotech Moderna over the lipid nanoparticle delivery system used for its approved COVID-19 vaccine. Genevant and Arbutus Biopharma filed several patent infringement claims against Moderna arguing that the vaccine developer used their technology without license or proper compensation. A judge sided with Arbutus and Genevant in April, with a trial set for next year. See the full class of 2019 . ___________________________________________ 2018 BlueRock Therapeutics Status: Bought by Bayer Bayer bought cell therapy biotech BlueRock Therapeutics in August 2019 for $1 billion, but rather than absorbing the company into itself, the German pharma kept the name and unit operating. This unusual but refreshing strategy means that the company essentially lives on. In June 2023, BlueRock reported that Parkinson’s disease stem cell therapy bemdaneprocel was well tolerated with no significant side effects in a Phase I trial with 12 patients. It was the first cell therapy to show positive results in human testing, Bayer said at the time. A September update showed similar safety results. The therapy has since received a regenerative medicine advanced therapy tag from the FDA. Elsewhere in the pipeline, BlueRock’s investigational iPSC-derived cell therapy OpCT-001 for certain retinal disorders was cleared for human testing in September. The therapy was licensed from FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics and Opsis Therapeutics. See the full class of 2018 . ___________________________________________ 2017 Decibel Therapeutics Status: Bought by Regeneron Regeneron made a splash at this year’s American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy meeting in Baltimore when it showcased results of a Phase I/II trial of hearing loss therapy DB-OTO. The therapy restored hearing in two children who had a genetic form of hearing loss. While Regeneron’s branding was behind the conference presentation, the gene therapy came from Decibel Therapeutics. Regeneron bought the biotech for $109 million in August 2023, at which point the two companies had already been working together for six years. The biotech was integrated into Regeneron’s genetic medicines portfolio. See the full class of 2017 . ___________________________________________ 2016 CRISPR Therapeutics Status: Operating CRISPR Therapeutics made history last year as the first company, along with partner Vertex Pharmaceuticals, to gain an FDA approval for a CRISPR-based gene edited therapy. The companies were granted an FDA greenlight for Casgevy in sickle cell disease. The same day, bluebird bio got a similar nod for a competing gene therapy, though not one that involves CRISPR technology. The FDA approval was a triumph of modern biotechnology. But the roll out has been slow given the nature of gene therapy treatment, and only recently have patients begun receiving infusions of the medicine. Casgevy is now also approved for beta thalassemia, another blood disorder. The company has turned to the rest of its pipeline, including a CD19-directed CAR T cell program called CTX112, which is being tested in both cancer and autoimmune disorders. CTX131 is in development for hematological malignancies as well. CEO Sam Kulkarni has expressed confidence in CRISPR’s leading position in gene editing and pledged to be on top of emerging technologies. “One of the most important considerations for us is that we don’t get disrupted,” he said at the Goldman Sachs healthcare conference in June. “We are the leaders in the gene editing space and we have been, but we want to make sure that we’re looking at every improvement that’s coming out there.” See the full class of 2016 . ___________________________________________ 2015 Spark Therapeutics Status: Bought by Roche Like BlueRock, Spark Therapeutics was folded into a Big Pharma but kept its identity. Spark earned a spot on our very first NextGen list in 2015 thanks to its active clinical hemophilia program and fundraises totaling $122.8 million. The company caught the eye of Roche, which swooped in with a $4.8 billion bid in February 2019. The deal eventually turned into a bit of a boondoggle, with regulatory delays slowing things down until it finally closed that December. At issue was Roche’s hemophilia Hemlibra. Regulators worried that Spark’s hemophilia program and Hemlibra together could stifle competition and create a monopoly. Spark brought with it the approved eye disease gene therapy Luxturna. With the deal closed, Spark has charged forward under the Roche banner. The unit is developing a 500,000-square foot Gene Therapy Innovation Center in Philadelphia as its flagship manufacturing space. See the full class of 2015 .

Clinical Trials at American Society of Nephrology (ASN) – Kidney Week 2024 SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 28, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Kind Pharmaceutical ("Hangzhou Andao Pharmaceutical Ltd. and Kind Pharmaceuticals LLC"), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative medicines to treat hematological diseases and cancers, today announced that positive results of four clinical trials from its leading program AND017 to treat anemia in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) and dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) were presented at annual meeting of American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Kidney Week in San Diego. The four clinical trials are first-in-human trial in healthy subjects in Austria (clinical trial "AU-001", NCT04751539), food effects on pharmacokinetics (PK) in China (clinical trial "CN-101", NCT04712500), phase 2 trial in anemia in NDD CKD in both US and China (clinical trial "MN-201", NCT05035641), and phase 2 trial in anemia in DD CKD in both US and China (clinical trial "MN-202", NCT05265325). In the AU-001 double-blinded, placebo-controlled, first-in-human clinical trial in healthy subjects in Australia, AND017 demonstrated favorable linear oral pharmacokinetics (PK) with T1/2 (elimination half-life) between 11.9 h and 19.7 h for the SAD part of trial (dosed from 1 mg to 50 mg) and T1/2 between 10.1 h and 19.4 h for the MAD part of trial (dosed from 4 mg to 30 mg QD for 10 days). In this trial, preliminary PD markers (EPO, Hb) were observed. In AU-001 trial, AND017 was safe and well tolerated in all doses (1 mg to 50 mg in SAD and 4 mg to 30 mg in MAD trials). In the CN-101 phase I, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period, crossover, single dose (10 mg) trial, the effect of food on the PK of AND017 was studied in non-elderly healthy subjects in China. The Fed/Fasted ratio of geometric mean of Cmax was 79.61% with 90% CI (73.40, 86.34) and the Fed/Fasted ratio of geometric mean of AUC0-inf was 99.93% with 90% CI (96.31, 103,68). The CN-101 trial demonstrated that AND017 with the current formulation can be administered with or without food. In the MN-201 phase II, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose ranging study in U.S. and China, a total of 113 NDD CKD patients were randomized at 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of the four treatment groups to receive AND017 at three different doses of 8 mg, 12 mg, 16 mg, or placebo three times weekly (TIW) (28, 29, 28, and 28 patients respectively) in the first 5-week fixed-dose period; at Week 6 the drug-treated patients were combined and re-randomized to two TIW and once weekly (QW) dosing regimens to enter the 8-week titration period. At Week 6, the end of the titration period, all AND017 dose groups had significantly higher hemoglobin level (Hb) rise rate from baseline compared to placebo group; the dose of AND017 and the rate of rise in Hb were linearly correlated. After switching from the TIW dosing in the fixed-dose period, the Hb levels in both the TIW and QW dosing regimens maintained in the targeted range in the 8-week dose titration period. For the safety assessment, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 59 patients (69.4%) in the pooled AND017 group and 18 patients (64.3%) in the placebo group; the treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 10 patients (11.8%) in the pooled AND017 group and 1 patient (3.6%) in the placebo group. A total of six patients, three in AND017 12 mg group and three in AND017 16 mg group, experienced serious AEs (SAEs), none of which were assessed as treatment related. The MN-201 anemia in NDD-CKD trial demonstrated that AND017 was safe and well tolerated in NDD-CKD patients with safety prolife similar to the placebo; the drug effectively increased the Hb level in a dose-dependent manner starting at 8 mg TIW within the first 5-week fixed-dose period. The Hb levels were maintained within the target range 10.0-11.0 g/dL at both TIW and QW dosing groups in the following 8-week titration period. The MN-202 trial is a phase II, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study to treat anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in both U.S. and China. Eligible patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1:1 to AND017 10 mg TIW group (59 pts), AND017 16 mg QW group (56 pts), and the active comparator erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) group (59 pts) and patients were treated for a total of 20-week study treatment with doses of AND017 adjusted based on the study protocol and doses of ESA adjusted based on the local package insert or clinical practice to target Hb ranges within 11.0-11.0 g/dL in U.S. and 10.0-12.0 g/dL in China. In the primary efficacy analysis, both AND017 10 mg TIW and 16 mg QW groups showed non-inferiority to ESA in the maintaining Hb levels within the target range during the 20-week treatment. For the safety assessment, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 91 patients (78.4%) treated with AND017 and 39 patients (66.1%) treated with ESA. Among all frequently reported TREAEs, the only TEAE deemed treatment-related was hyperkalemia (1 patient, 1.7% from the AND017 10 mg TIW group); other treatment-related TEAEs were all <5% and occurred in no more than 2 patients in the pooled AND017 or ESA groups. A total of 48 patients experienced SAEs, with 35 patients (30.2%) treated with AND017 and 13 patients (22.0%) treated with ESA; none were assessed as treatment related. Both TIW and QW dosing regimens of AND017 effectively maintained Hb levels after 20 weeks of treatment in ESA-treated dialysis-dependent ESKD patients and demonstrated non-inferiority to ESA treatment with a favorable safety profile. "AND017 demonstrated adequate safety and effectively increased and maintained hemoglobin levels in the 10.0-11.0 g/dL range in two Phase II studies involving both NDD and DD CKD patient populations. Efficacy and safety will be further assessed in Phase III trials," said Pablo E. Pergola, MD, Ph.D., an expert in nephrology and the director of the Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Renal Associates. "We are excited about the overall PK, efficacy and safety profiles of our compound; our results provided a once weekly, longer interval dosing option in the same class of drugs," Qi Zhu, MD, the CMO of Kind Pharmaceutical. "The longer interval dosing could be one of the keys to mitigate MACE issue, which plagued the previous clinical trials for anemia in NDD CKD. We are willing to tackle this tough problem in phase III trials." The summary of the results from the four clinical trials presented at ANS is shown below; for more detail, please read the posters from Kind's website. Last week FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to this investigation drug in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) treatment. About Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is very common in general population; the prevalence for CKD in the United States is about 14% in adults and that in China is about 8%. Anemia is a common complication in chronic kidney disease. There are about half million dialysis-dependent CKD anemia patients and about five million non-dialysis-dependent CKD anemia patients in US; it is estimated there are about 700K DD CKD anemia patients and about 50 million NDD CKD anemia patients in China. Anemia in CKD can increase the risk of cardiovascular complications, such as heart failure and stroke, and increase morbidity and mortality. About AND017 AND017 is a first-in-class hemoglobin elevating agent (HbEA) that targets multiple stages of the red blood cell (RBC) life cycle and is being developed to treat anemia associated with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD), non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD), cancer-related anemia (CRA), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) anemia, sickle cell disease (SCD), and β-thalassemia. About Kind Pharmaceutical ("Hangzhou Andao Pharmaceutical Ltd. and Kind Pharmaceuticals LLC") KIND is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative medicines to treat hematological diseases and cancers. The company's mission, "kind to human, humble to science, good to patients", drives its commitment to advancing current science to meet unmet medical need. KIND's lead clinical candidate, AND017, first-in-class hemoglobin elevating agent (HbEA), is being developed for treating anemia of various disorders, including dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) associated anemia, non-dialysis dependent (NDD) CKD associated anemia, cancer related anemia (CRA), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) anemia, sickle cell disease (SCD), and β-thalassemia. KIND's second clinical candidate, AND019, an orally available brain penetrant selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), is being developed to treat ER+/Her2- breast cancer. KIND is also developing promising disruptive next generation ADC technologies. For details, please visit . Contact: Dong Liu, PhD, Chairman and CEO of Kind Pharmaceutical Email: [email protected] Tel: 650-315 6151 SOURCE Kind Pharmaceuticals WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

PRESS RELEASE AB SCIENCE RECEIVES NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE FOR EUROPEAN PATENT COVERING MASITINIB UNTIL 2040 IN THE TREATMENT OF SICKLE CELL DISEASE THIS DECISION FURTHER STRENGTHENS MASITINIB’S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADDING ONE MORE INDICATION WITH LONG TERM PROTECTION MASITINIB IS IN PHASE 2 IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE Paris, October 28, 2024, 5.45pm CET AB Science SA (Euronext - FR0010557264 - AB) today announced that the European Patent Office has issued a Notice of Allowance for a patent relating to methods of treating sickle cell disease (i.e. a medical use patent) with its lead compound masitinib, based on preclinical data. This new European patent provides intellectual property protection for masitinib in this indication until November 2040. Professor Olivier Hermine, President of the AB Science Scientific Committee and member of the French Academy of Sciences and Head of Hematology Department at Necker Hospital commented: “Masitinib represents a promising novel strategy for treating sickle cell disease and its serious complication of acute chest syndrome, which can lead to the development of chronic lung disease and is a common cause of hospitalization or even death. There is an increasing need in sickle cell disease with several new drugs being retrieved from market for lack of efficacy or toxicity; however, unlike masitinib, none of these drugs target mast cells”. Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited red blood cell disorders, with masitinib being developed to treat the severest forms of the disease, accounting for about 65% of SCD. Severe SCD represents a major public health challenge and leads to early death. Treatment for SCD can be curative based on gene therapy (targets the HbS mutation), however, such an option remains extremely limited due to scarcity of donors, unresolved safety challenges, and very high costs. Standard treatment for SCD includes ​​red blood cell transfusions and treatment with hydroxyurea to manage complications, but significant unmet need remains. Mast cells, a major target for masitinib, appear to play a critical role for the severe forms of SCD and its complications, such as vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), acute chest syndrome (ACS), and pain [1-2]. Masitinib has demonstrated survival benefit in an SCD mouse model: all control SCD mice experienced VOC and 83% died in the first 3 hours, whereas SCD mice pretreated with masitinib for 4 days, experienced no VOCs and no death. Furthermore, lung histology and immune immunohistochemistry showed that masitinib protects from acute lung injuries and mast cell infiltration in an SCD mouse model. Masitinib clinical development in SCD is being conducted as part of the SICKMAST collaborative program, funded with 9.2 million euros [3], which aims to demonstrate in a phase 2 clinical trial the efficacy of masitinib in the treatment of acute and chronic complications of SCD in patients identified based on biomarkers. The Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) will be the promoter of these phase 2 studies. AB Science will mainly be involved in supplying masitinib and monitoring masitinib pharmacovigilance data. AB Science remains free to carry out, as it sees fit, any potential phase 3 development following the success of phase 2. Sickle cell disease Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder affecting millions of people worldwide. Although life expectancy has increased over the last 20 years, acute and chronic complications still result in comorbidities, high social burden and premature death at around 40 years. Approximately 1.1% of couples worldwide are at risk of having a child with a hemoglobin disorder (sickle cell disease or thalassemia), and 2.3 conceptions per 1,000 are affected by sickle cell disease. Estimates suggest that each year, around 300,000 children are born with sickle cell disease, and this number could reach 400,000 by 2050 [4]. Sickle cell disease affects over 100,000 children and adults in the United States. In France, approximately 26,000 patients are affected (50% children, 50% adults). Rationale for the use of masitinib in this indication Inflammation mediated by innate immune cells and promoting vaso-occlusion has recently been shown to play a major role in sickle cell disease. In particular, our clinical observations and experimental work in mice, have revealed the involvement of mast cells and basophils in complications associated with sickle cell disease: The degree of mast cell activation in patients with sickle cell disease may contribute to the heterogeneity of inflammation and chronic and acute complications.The potential role of basophils in sickle cell disease has not been studied, however, given their role in various diseases and their ability to release substance P and histamine, they could also play important roles in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Masitinib is an inhibitor of KIT, LYN, and FYN, three major kinases involved in the activation of mast cells and basophils. Medical need The classic view of sickle cell disease pathophysiology involves polymerization of mutated hemoglobin (HbS) leading to red blood cell (RBC) sickling with subsequent hemolytic anemia, painful vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS). Current treatment options such as hydroxycarbamide, chronic transfusion or anti-P-selectin antibodies, do not fully prevent life-threatening acute and chronic complications of sickle cell disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation and gene therapy are available only for a minority of patients, are associated with toxicity and are very expensive, which limits their use. There is a significant medical need to prevent the acute and chronic complications of sickle cell disease. References [1] Allali S, Lionnet F, Mattioni S, et al. Br J Haematol. 2019;186(1):125-129. [2] Allali S, Maciel TT, Hermine O, de Montalembert M. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):273-283. [3] AB Science Press Release, 27th November 2023. https://www.ab-science.com/the-clinical-development-of-masitinib-in-sickle-cell-disease-is-among-the-19-winning-projects-under-the-sixth-call-for-hospital-inuversity-research-in-health-rhu/ [4] Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1561-1573. About AB Science Founded in 2001, AB Science is a pharmaceutical company specializing in the research, development and commercialization of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs), a class of targeted proteins whose action are key in signaling pathways within cells. Our programs target only diseases with high unmet medical needs, often lethal with short term survival or rare or refractory to previous line of treatment. AB Science has developed a proprietary portfolio of molecules and the Company’s lead compound, masitinib, has already been registered for veterinary medicine and is developed in human medicine in oncology, neurological diseases, inflammatory diseases and viral diseases. The company is headquartered in Paris, France, and listed on Euronext Paris (ticker: AB). Further information is available on AB Science’s website: www.ab-science.com. Forward-looking Statements - AB Science This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts. These statements include projections and estimates as well as the assumptions on which they are based, statements based on projects, objectives, intentions and expectations regarding financial results, events, operations, future services, product development and their potential or future performance. These forward-looking statements can often be identified by the words "expect", "anticipate", "believe", "intend", "estimate" or "plan" as well as other similar terms. While AB Science believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of AB Science and which may imply that results and actual events significantly differ from those expressed, induced or anticipated in the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include the uncertainties related to product development of the Company which may not be successful or to the marketing authorizations granted by competent authorities or, more generally, any factors that may affect marketing capacity of the products developed by AB Science, as well as those developed or identified in the public documents published by AB Science. AB Science disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update the forward-looking information and statements, subject to the applicable regulations, in particular articles 223-1 et seq. of the AMF General Regulations. For additional information, please contact: AB Science Financial Communication & Media Relations investors@ab-science.com Attachment Sickle Cell Patent EPO vENG VF