Fospropofol Disodium

Xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) contributes significantly to generating reactive oxygen species in coronary artery disease (CAD). XDH has been proposed as a therapeutic target, but its genetic variants could affect protein structure and drug response. We aimed to assess protein structure modification occur due to genetic variants and to screen 215 CAD drugs for their utility in personalized CAD treatment against the XDH variants. A series of computational methods were implemented to identify pathogenic variants that cause XDH structure instability localized at the con served regions contributing to functional significance. Then, the XDH structures with the pathogenic variants were modeled using two different approaches to select the best models for docking with the CAD drugs. Finally, the stability of the docked complexes and their ability to transfer electrons were evaluated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculation. Among 751 variants examined; R149C and Q919R showed high pathogenicity, localized in conserved regions could alter protein structure and function. Further, docking of CAD drugs against XDH (native, R149C and Q919R) showed vericiguat with higher affinity, ranging from −7.95 kcal/mol to −10.41 kcal/mol, than the well-known XDH inhibitor (febuxostat, −5.73 kcal/mol to −8.35 kcal/mol). This indicates that vericiguat will be effective in CAD treatment, regardless of the XDH variants. Additionally, MD simulation and QM/MM confirmed vericiguat stability and electron transfer ability to form hydrogen bonds with the XDH protein. In conclusion, vericiguat will be beneficial for the personalized treatment of CAD by inhibiting XDH variants. Additional clinical studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

Fospropofol disodium is a propofol prodrug that is water-soluble and has a reduced risk of bacterial contamination and hypertriglyceridemia compared with propofol. Prior to implementing a large randomized trial, we investigated the feasibility, initial efficacy, and safety of fospropofol disodium compared with propofol in long-term mild-to-moderate sedation in intensive care units (ICUs).

Single-centered, prospective, unblind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial.

The general ICU of university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Adult patients (n = 60) expected to have mechanical ventilation for >24 h were enrolled and randomly assigned to the fospropofol or propofol group.

The fospropofol group received continuous fospropofol disodium infusions and the propofol group received continuous propofol infusions. The sedation goal was a score of -3 to 0 on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS).

The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the target sedation range without rescue sedation. Safety outcomes were based on adverse events. Blood samples were collected to measure formate concentration in plasma.

The median dose was 4.33 (IQR, 3.08-4.94) mg/kg/h in the fospropofol group and 1.96 (IQR, 1.44-2.94) mg/kg/h in the propofol group. The median percentage of time spent in the target RASS range without rescue sedation was identical in both groups, with 83.33% (IQR, 74.43%-100.00%) in the fospropofol group and 83.33% (IQR, 77.45%-100.00%) in the propofol group (p = 0.887). At least one adverse event was identifed in 23 (76.7%) fospropofol patients and 27 (90.0%) propofol patients. The most common adverse events were tachycardia and hypotension. No paresthesia, catheter-related bloodstream infection or propofol infusion syndrome in both groups was reported. Three patients in the fospropofol group had mild hypertriglyceridemia, and nine patients in propofol group had hypertriglyceridemia (mild in eight patients and moderate in one patient) (10% versus 30%, p = 0.104). The formate concentration in plasma was very low, and no significant difference was identified at any time point between the two groups.

Fospropofol disodium appears to be a feasible, effective and safe sedative for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation with long-term sedation.